The alpha particles close to the nuclei were affected by its charge, but the vast majority of particles shot at the gold foil went straight through. What did Rutherford conclude because of this fact?

Answer 1

That most of the atom was empty space.

An underlying assumption of this experiment that is not always appreciated is the infinitesimal THINNESS of the gold foil. Malleability refers to the ability of the material to be beaten into a sheet. All metals are malleable, gold is extremely malleable amongst metals. A block of gold can be beaten into a foil only a few atoms thick, which I think is quite phenomenal, and such gold foils/films were used in this experiment.

When Rutherford shot heavy #alpha-"particles"# most of the particles passed thru as expected (#alpha-"particles"# are helium ions, #""^4He^+#); a few were deflected; and a smaller few bounced back at the #alpha-"particle"# emitter; an astonishing outcome given the thinness of the gold foil.

Rutherford could only account for these phenomena by proposing an atomic model in which MOST of the atom was EMPTY space, and a small, massive, nuclear core contained most of the mass of the atom. The nuclear age was born.

Also see this old answer, especially as it contains Rutherford's reaction to his experiment.

Sign up to view the whole answer

By signing up, you agree to our Terms of Service and Privacy Policy

Sign up with email
Answer 2

Rutherford came to the conclusion that the bulk of an atom is made up of empty space, with a dense, positively charged nucleus at its core.

Sign up to view the whole answer

By signing up, you agree to our Terms of Service and Privacy Policy

Sign up with email
Answer from HIX Tutor

When evaluating a one-sided limit, you need to be careful when a quantity is approaching zero since its sign is different depending on which way it is approaching zero from. Let us look at some examples.

When evaluating a one-sided limit, you need to be careful when a quantity is approaching zero since its sign is different depending on which way it is approaching zero from. Let us look at some examples.

When evaluating a one-sided limit, you need to be careful when a quantity is approaching zero since its sign is different depending on which way it is approaching zero from. Let us look at some examples.

When evaluating a one-sided limit, you need to be careful when a quantity is approaching zero since its sign is different depending on which way it is approaching zero from. Let us look at some examples.

Not the question you need?

Drag image here or click to upload

Or press Ctrl + V to paste
Answer Background
HIX Tutor
Solve ANY homework problem with a smart AI
  • 98% accuracy study help
  • Covers math, physics, chemistry, biology, and more
  • Step-by-step, in-depth guides
  • Readily available 24/7