Let M and N be matrices , #M = [(a, b),(c,d)] and N =[(e, f),(g, h)],# and #v# a vector #v = [(x), (y)].# Show that #M(Nv) = (MN)v#?

Answer 1

This is called an associative law of multiplication.
See the proof below.

(1) #Nv = [(e,f),(g,h)]*[(x),(y)] = [(ex+fy),(gx+hy)]#
(2) #M(Nv)= [(a,b),(c,d)]* [(ex+fy),(gx+hy)] = [(aex+afy+bgx+bhy),(cex+cfy+dgx+dhy)]#
(3) #MN= [(a,b),(c,d)]* [(e,f),(g,h)] = [(ae+bg,af+bh),(ce+dg,cf+dh)]#
(4) #(MN)v = [(ae+bg,af+bh),(ce+dg,cf+dh)]*[(x),(y)] = [(aex+bgx+afy+bhy),(cex+dgx+cfy+dhy)]#

Notice that the final expression for vector in (2) is the same as the final expression for vector in (4), just the order of summation is changed.

End of proof.

Sign up to view the whole answer

By signing up, you agree to our Terms of Service and Privacy Policy

Sign up with email
Answer 2

To show that M(Nv)=(MN)v M(Nv) = (MN)v , we first need to compute each of these expressions.

Starting with M(Nv) M(Nv) :

M(Nv)=M(N(xy))M(Nv) = M\left(N\begin{pmatrix}x\\y\end{pmatrix}\right) =M((efgh)(xy))= M\left(\begin{pmatrix}e & f\\g & h\end{pmatrix}\begin{pmatrix}x\\y\end{pmatrix}\right) =M((ex+fygx+hy))= M\left(\begin{pmatrix}ex + fy\\gx + hy\end{pmatrix}\right) =(abcd)(ex+fygx+hy)= \begin{pmatrix}a & b\\c & d\end{pmatrix}\begin{pmatrix}ex + fy\\gx + hy\end{pmatrix} =(a(ex+fy)+b(gx+hy)c(ex+fy)+d(gx+hy))= \begin{pmatrix}a(ex + fy) + b(gx + hy)\\c(ex + fy) + d(gx + hy)\end{pmatrix} =(aex+afy+bgx+bhycex+cfy+dgx+dhy)= \begin{pmatrix}aex + afy + bgx + bhy\\cex + cfy + dgx + dhy\end{pmatrix}

Now, moving on to (MN)v (MN)v :

(MN)v=((abcd)(efgh))(xy)(MN)v = \left(\begin{pmatrix}a & b\\c & d\end{pmatrix}\begin{pmatrix}e & f\\g & h\end{pmatrix}\right)\begin{pmatrix}x\\y\end{pmatrix} =((ae+bg)(af+bh)$ce+dg)(cf+dh))(xy)= \begin{pmatrix}(ae + bg) & (af + bh)\$ce + dg) & (cf + dh)\end{pmatrix}\begin{pmatrix}x\\y\end{pmatrix} =((ae+bg)x+(af+bh)y$ce+dg)x+(cf+dh)y)= \begin{pmatrix}(ae + bg)x + (af + bh)y\$ce + dg)x + (cf + dh)y\end{pmatrix}

Comparing the two results, we see that M(Nv)=(MN)v M(Nv) = (MN)v . Hence, the equality holds.

Sign up to view the whole answer

By signing up, you agree to our Terms of Service and Privacy Policy

Sign up with email
Answer from HIX Tutor

When evaluating a one-sided limit, you need to be careful when a quantity is approaching zero since its sign is different depending on which way it is approaching zero from. Let us look at some examples.

When evaluating a one-sided limit, you need to be careful when a quantity is approaching zero since its sign is different depending on which way it is approaching zero from. Let us look at some examples.

When evaluating a one-sided limit, you need to be careful when a quantity is approaching zero since its sign is different depending on which way it is approaching zero from. Let us look at some examples.

When evaluating a one-sided limit, you need to be careful when a quantity is approaching zero since its sign is different depending on which way it is approaching zero from. Let us look at some examples.

Not the question you need?

Drag image here or click to upload

Or press Ctrl + V to paste
Answer Background
HIX Tutor
Solve ANY homework problem with a smart AI
  • 98% accuracy study help
  • Covers math, physics, chemistry, biology, and more
  • Step-by-step, in-depth guides
  • Readily available 24/7