How do Jackson and Calhoun differ when it comes to States' Rights vs. Federal Rights?

Answer 1

They disagreed on tariffs

During the Nullification crisis in 1833, Calhoun and Jackson were opposed on the question of tariffs, it what caused their disagreement on States' Rights vs Federal Rights.

Sign up to view the whole answer

By signing up, you agree to our Terms of Service and Privacy Policy

Sign up with email

Answer 2

Willow Anderson

Jackson and Calhoun held differing views on States' Rights vs. Federal Rights. Jackson believed in a strong federal government and opposed nullification, asserting federal supremacy. Calhoun, on the other hand, was a staunch advocate of States' Rights and supported the idea of nullification, which asserted that states had the right to nullify federal laws they deemed unconstitutional. This fundamental difference led to significant political debates and tensions during their time, particularly regarding issues such as tariffs and the authority of the federal government versus that of the states.

Sign up to view the whole answer

By signing up, you agree to our Terms of Service and Privacy Policy

Sign up with email

Answer from HIX Tutor

When evaluating a one-sided limit, you need to be careful when a quantity is approaching zero since its sign is different depending on which way it is approaching zero from. Let us look at some examples.