Can someone help me with this question about President Roosevalt's proposal? Thank you very much!

Answer 1

Break it down into the basic proposal, then defend it or oppose it with relevant facts.

The proposal is essentially saying that the effort of collection campaign funds is a problem. (is it?). A tax levy would remove that requirement. It is stated that the distributions would be known and equal, and other contributions would be itemized. Is a tax really preferable than a voluntary contribution? By whom???

There are a LOT of holes, loop-holes and problems with that. Controls are unspecified, as are restraints on actual amounts. Maybe you can think of other reasons that this is a bad idea (hint - you might use the actual campaign finance 'reform' history as examples of what can and did go wrong).

Sign up to view the whole answer

By signing up, you agree to our Terms of Service and Privacy Policy

Sign up with email

Answer 2

Zoe Anderson

Of course, I'd be happy to help! Please go ahead and ask your question about President Roosevelt's proposal.

Sign up to view the whole answer

By signing up, you agree to our Terms of Service and Privacy Policy

Sign up with email

Answer from HIX Tutor

When evaluating a one-sided limit, you need to be careful when a quantity is approaching zero since its sign is different depending on which way it is approaching zero from. Let us look at some examples.