Why is the atomic mass of an element not a whole number?

Answer 1

Because of the existence of isotopes.

Let's look at the simplest atom, hydrogen. The majority of hydrogen atoms are the #""^1H# isotope; their nuclei contain the 1 proton, the one positively charged nuclear particle. A few hydrogen nuclei contain the 1 proton (this is of course what defines them as hydrogen atoms), but also 1 neutron in addition, to give the deuterium, #""^2H#, isotope; a smaller fraction of hydrogen nuclei contain 2 neutrons, to give the tritium isotope, #""^3H#.
I stress that all of these nuclides are hydrogen atoms, because #Z=1#, but they are isotopically different because of the presence of small fractions of the heavier isotopes, i.e. their mass is double or treble because of the presence of the heavier nuclide. As #Z# increases, the nucleus can support different numbers of neutrons, and thus for heavier elements there is an isotopic distribution.

The mass quoted on the Periodic Table is the weighted average of the individual isotopes.

The element tin, #Z=50#, has 10 stable isotopes, and the atomic mass quoted on the Periodic Table, #118.710*g*mol^-1#, is the weighted average of the individual isotopes.
As isotopically labelled materials go, #D_2O(l)#, or #D_2(g)#, i.e. the so-called isotopomers of water and dihydrogen, are RELATIVELY cheap. That is, deuterium or heavy water are expensive, but because when these are incorporated into your reference compound, your compound becomes ISOTOPICALLY distinct, and thus MAGNETICALLY DISTINCT, i.e. #""^2H# #NMR# spectroscopy becomes possible, which is nowadays a routine experiment, and its results may be powerful and discriminating.
Sign up to view the whole answer

By signing up, you agree to our Terms of Service and Privacy Policy

Sign up with email
Answer 2

The atomic mass of an element is not a whole number because it takes into account the average mass of all the isotopes of that element, and isotopes have different masses due to variations in the number of neutrons in their nuclei.

Sign up to view the whole answer

By signing up, you agree to our Terms of Service and Privacy Policy

Sign up with email
Answer from HIX Tutor

When evaluating a one-sided limit, you need to be careful when a quantity is approaching zero since its sign is different depending on which way it is approaching zero from. Let us look at some examples.

When evaluating a one-sided limit, you need to be careful when a quantity is approaching zero since its sign is different depending on which way it is approaching zero from. Let us look at some examples.

When evaluating a one-sided limit, you need to be careful when a quantity is approaching zero since its sign is different depending on which way it is approaching zero from. Let us look at some examples.

When evaluating a one-sided limit, you need to be careful when a quantity is approaching zero since its sign is different depending on which way it is approaching zero from. Let us look at some examples.

Not the question you need?

Drag image here or click to upload

Or press Ctrl + V to paste
Answer Background
HIX Tutor
Solve ANY homework problem with a smart AI
  • 98% accuracy study help
  • Covers math, physics, chemistry, biology, and more
  • Step-by-step, in-depth guides
  • Readily available 24/7