Why did the colonists believe that "life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness" were inalienable rights?

Answer 1

They meant that no matter what happened, those rights were always intact

They wanted to have ground rules and assure the people that the freedom they fought so hard for was going to stay that way!

Sign up to view the whole answer

By signing up, you agree to our Terms of Service and Privacy Policy

Sign up with email
Answer 2

This belief was based on Biblical principles and natural law, as well as historical precedent.

The historical precedent was that prior to the French and Indian Wars, the American Colonists had been granted the fundamental human rights of Englishmen along with a great deal of freedom to enact their own laws.

King George of England revoked these rights following the French and Indian Wars, citing the American colonists as tenants on crown land. He also dissolved local legislatures, removed colonial governors, and installed his own appointees as colonial rulers.

Nowhere in the Bible does the King have the divine right to rule, according to English writer John Locke. Rather, natural law established that people have fundamental human rights independent of the King or the Government. Locke's writings established people's fundamental human rights based on natural law and biblical principles.

In the Declaration of Independence, Thomas Jefferson expressed a similar view, writing that since individuals were endowed by God with life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness, these rights were fundamental human rights.

The colonists felt that their rights were unalienable because they were not granted by the King or the government and could not be taken away arbitrarily because they were based on historical precedent, biblical principles, and natural law.

Sign up to view the whole answer

By signing up, you agree to our Terms of Service and Privacy Policy

Sign up with email
Answer from HIX Tutor

When evaluating a one-sided limit, you need to be careful when a quantity is approaching zero since its sign is different depending on which way it is approaching zero from. Let us look at some examples.

When evaluating a one-sided limit, you need to be careful when a quantity is approaching zero since its sign is different depending on which way it is approaching zero from. Let us look at some examples.

When evaluating a one-sided limit, you need to be careful when a quantity is approaching zero since its sign is different depending on which way it is approaching zero from. Let us look at some examples.

When evaluating a one-sided limit, you need to be careful when a quantity is approaching zero since its sign is different depending on which way it is approaching zero from. Let us look at some examples.

Not the question you need?

Drag image here or click to upload

Or press Ctrl + V to paste
Answer Background
HIX Tutor
Solve ANY homework problem with a smart AI
  • 98% accuracy study help
  • Covers math, physics, chemistry, biology, and more
  • Step-by-step, in-depth guides
  • Readily available 24/7