What is the molar solubility of #Ca_3(PO_4)_2# in 0.0015 M #Ca(NO_3)_2# if #K_(sp)# for #Ca_3(PO_4)_2# is #1.0xx10^(-18)#?

I'm aware that's probably not the accurate #K_(sp)# for said compound, but is it possible to work out a similarly structured process with that given "constant" ?

Answer 1
#s = 3.92 xx 10^(-13) "M"#.
Using the #K_(sp)# of calcium phosphate, which is #2.07 xx 10^(-33)#, we first note that calcium nitrate introduces the #"Ca"^(2+)# common ion.
However, since calcium nitrate is a strong electrolyte, AND it contains only one #"Ca"^(2+)# per formula unit, it introduces #100%# of its concentration as #"Ca"^(2+)# and #200%# of its concentration as #"NO"_3^(-)#.
Hence, that becomes the initial concentration of #"Ca"^(2+)# (whereas the nitrate just sits around), instead of zero:
#"Ca"_3("PO"_4)_2(s) rightleftharpoons color(red)(3)"Ca"^(2+)(aq) + color(red)(2)"PO"_4^(3-)(aq)#
#"I"" "-" "" "" "" "" "" "0.0015" "" "" "0# #"C"" "-" "" "" "" "" "+color(red)(3)s" "" "" "+color(red)(2)s# #"E"" "-" "" "" "" "" "0.0015+color(red)(3)s" "" "color(red)(2)s#
where #s# is the molar solubility of calcium phosphate. Each product is forming in water, so they get #+# in the ICE table.

Recall that both the exponents and the coefficients affect the concentration change.

#K_(sp) = 2.07 xx 10^(-33) = ["Ca"^(2+)]^color(red)(3)["PO"_4^(3-)]^color(red)(2)#
#= (0.0015 + 3color(red)(s))^color(red)(3)(color(red)(2)s)^color(red)(2)#
Now, since #K_(sp)# is so small (even the one given in the problem), #3s# #"<<"# #0.0015#, so:
#2.07 xx 10^(-33) = (0.0015)^3(2s)^2#
#= 3.38 xx 10^(-9) cdot 4s^2#
#= 1.35 xx 10^(-8)s^2#

You can now calculate calcium phosphate's molar solubility without using a fifth-order polynomial.

#color(blue)(s) = sqrt((2.07 xx 10^(-33))/(1.35 xx 10^(-8)))#
#= color(blue)(3.92 xx 10^(-13) "M")#
What would then be the molar solubility of #"Ca"^(2+)# in terms of #s#? What about #"PO"_4^(3-)# in terms of #s#?
On the other hand, without #"Ca"("NO"_3)_2# in solution,
#K_(sp) = (3s)^3(2s)^2 = 108s^5 = 2.07 xx 10^(-33)#

And in pure water, this molar solubility is as follows:

#s = (K_(sp)/108)^(1//5) = 1.14 xx 10^(-7) "M"#
This is about #1000000# times less soluble in #"0.0015 M"# calcium nitrate than in pure water, so the calcium common ion suppresses the solubility of calcium phosphate.

The common ion effect is that.

Sign up to view the whole answer

By signing up, you agree to our Terms of Service and Privacy Policy

Sign up with email
Answer 2

The molar solubility of #Ca_3(PO_4)2# is #8.6xx10^-6# M

ICE table: #" " " | " " Ca_3PO_4(s)\rightleftharpoons3Ca^(2+)(aq)+2PO_4^(3-)(aq)# #\text(I) " " | " [solid] " " " " " " " 0.0015 " " " " " 0# #\text(C) " | " -s " " " " " " " " " " +3s " " " " +2s# #\text(E) " | [solid]-s " " " 0.0015+3s " " " " 2s#
#K_(sp)=1.0xx10^(-18)\rArr\color(red)(108x^5)??# (I don't know what this red part means, really) #" " " "\rArr[0.0015+3x]^3[2x]^2# #" " " "\cong(0.0015)^3*4x^2# #\thereforex=\sqrt((1.0xx10^(-18))/(0.0015^3*4))\approx8.6xx10^-6# M
And as #s\hArrx=[Ca_3(PO_4)_2]#, so the molar solubility of #Ca_3(PO_4)2# is #8.6xx10^-6# M
Sign up to view the whole answer

By signing up, you agree to our Terms of Service and Privacy Policy

Sign up with email
Answer 3

To find the molar solubility of Ca₃(PO₄)₂ in 0.0015 M Ca(NO₃)₂, calculate the concentration of PO₄³⁻ ions using the ion product (Q) and compare it to the Ksp value. The molar solubility is the square root of the ratio of Ksp to Q.

Sign up to view the whole answer

By signing up, you agree to our Terms of Service and Privacy Policy

Sign up with email
Answer from HIX Tutor

When evaluating a one-sided limit, you need to be careful when a quantity is approaching zero since its sign is different depending on which way it is approaching zero from. Let us look at some examples.

When evaluating a one-sided limit, you need to be careful when a quantity is approaching zero since its sign is different depending on which way it is approaching zero from. Let us look at some examples.

When evaluating a one-sided limit, you need to be careful when a quantity is approaching zero since its sign is different depending on which way it is approaching zero from. Let us look at some examples.

When evaluating a one-sided limit, you need to be careful when a quantity is approaching zero since its sign is different depending on which way it is approaching zero from. Let us look at some examples.

Not the question you need?

Drag image here or click to upload

Or press Ctrl + V to paste
Answer Background
HIX Tutor
Solve ANY homework problem with a smart AI
  • 98% accuracy study help
  • Covers math, physics, chemistry, biology, and more
  • Step-by-step, in-depth guides
  • Readily available 24/7