how you solve: #lim_(n->oo)(2-sqrt2)(2-root(3)2)(2-root(4)2)...(2-root(n)2))# ?

Answer 1

#prod_(k=2)^oo(2-root(k)(2)) = 0#

At first glance, we would propose #0# as the limit value. This conclusion is correct but must be proved.
So calling #a_n = 2-root(n)(2)#, the condition #a_n < 1# is not sufficient for convergence to zero in
#lim_(n->oo)prod_(k=2)^n(2-2^(1/k))#

The necessary and sufficient condition for convergence of

#prod_(k=2)^oo a_k# to a non zero value is that #sum_(k=2)^oo log(a_k)# converges.
If #a_n < 1# and #sum_(k=2)^oo log(a_k)# does not converge, then #prod_(k=2)^oo a_n# converges to #0#.
Now considering the inequality #(x-1)/x le log(x), x > 1# we have
#(1 - 2^(1/k))/(2 - 2^(1/k)) le log(2-2^(1/k))#

Considering now

#sum_(k=2)^oo (1 - 2^(1/k))/(2 - 2^(1/k))#
with #b_k = (1 - 2^(1/k))/(2 - 2^(1/k))# clearly this series does not converge because #b_k > 0# and
#lim_(k->oo)b_k/b_(k+1)=1#
so because #sum_(k=2)^oo (1 - 2^(1/k))/(2 - 2^(1/k)) le sum_(k=2)^oo log(2-2^(1/k))#
#sum_(k=2)^oo log(2-2^(1/k))# does not converge then finally
#lim_(n->oo)prod_(k=2)^n(2-2^(1/k)) = 0#
Sign up to view the whole answer

By signing up, you agree to our Terms of Service and Privacy Policy

Sign up with email
Answer 2

#prod_(n=2)^oo(2-2^(1/n)) = 0#

Note that when #0 < t < 1# then:
#ln(1-t) = -sum_(n=1)^oo (t^n/n) < -t#

So:

#ln (prod_(n=2)^oo(2-2^(1/n))) =sum_(n=2)^oo ln(2-2^(1/n))#
#color(white)(ln (prod_(n=2)^oo(2-2^(1/n))))=sum_(n=2)^oo ln(1 - (2^(1/n) - 1))#
#color(white)(ln (prod_(n=2)^oo(2-2^(1/n))))<= -sum_(n=2)^oo (2^(1/n) - 1)#

Then:

#2^(1/n) = e^(1/n ln 2) = sum_(k=0)^oo (1/n ln 2)^k/(k!) > 1 + 1/n ln 2#

So:

#2^(1/n)-1 > 1/n ln 2#

So:

#sum_(n=2)^oo (2^(1/n)-1) >= ln 2 sum_(n=2)^oo 1/n#

diverges, since the harmonic series diverges.

So:

#lim_(N->oo) ln(prod_(n=2)^N(2-2^(1/n))) = -oo#

and therefore:

#prod_(n=2)^oo(2-2^(1/n)) = lim_(t->-oo) e^t = 0#
#color(white)()# Footnote

For reference, here's a failed attempt that nevertheless illustrates a way you might approach such a problem...

I think it should be possible to prove that the product is #0# using a method in a similar vein to the usual one for proving that the harmonic series diverges...

The basic idea is:

#(2-2^(1/2))(2-2^(1/3))(2-2^(1/4))(2-2^(1/5))(2-2^(1/6))(2-2^(1/7))(2-2^(1/8))...#
#<= underbrace((2-2^(1/2)))underbrace((2-2^(1/4))(2-2^(1/4)))underbrace((2-2^(1/8))(2-2^(1/8))(2-2^(1/8))(2-2^(1/8)))...#
#color(red)(cancel(color(black)(<=))) (2-2^(1/2))(2-2^(1/2))(2-2^(1/2))... = 0#

Hmmm...that does not quite work either, since:

#(2-2^(1/n))(2-2^(1/n)) > (2-2^(2/n))#
Sign up to view the whole answer

By signing up, you agree to our Terms of Service and Privacy Policy

Sign up with email
Answer 3

To solve the limit (\lim_{n \to \infty} (2 - \sqrt{2})(2 - \sqrt[3]{2})(2 - \sqrt[4]{2}) \ldots (2 - \sqrt[n]{2})), we recognize that each term in the product is of the form (2 - \sqrt[k]{2}), where (k) varies from (2) to (n).

Now, let's rewrite each term in a way that allows us to use a limit property. We can express (2 - \sqrt[k]{2}) as (\sqrt[k]{2} - 2). Then, we can rewrite the expression as (\lim_{n \to \infty} (\sqrt[k]{2} - 2)) as (k) ranges from (2) to (n).

Next, we notice that as (k) approaches infinity, (\sqrt[k]{2}) approaches (1). Therefore, (\sqrt[k]{2} - 2) approaches (1 - 2 = -1).

Since the limit of each term in the product approaches (-1), and we have an infinite number of such terms, the overall limit of the product is ((-1)^{\infty}).

However, ((-1)^{\infty}) is an indeterminate form. To resolve this, we can apply the natural logarithm and rewrite the expression as (\lim_{n \to \infty} \ln[(2 - \sqrt{2})(2 - \sqrt[3]{2})(2 - \sqrt[4]{2}) \ldots (2 - \sqrt[n]{2})]).

Using the property (\ln(ab) = \ln(a) + \ln(b)), we can rewrite the expression as (\lim_{n \to \infty} [\ln(2 - \sqrt{2}) + \ln(2 - \sqrt[3]{2}) + \ln(2 - \sqrt[4]{2}) + \ldots + \ln(2 - \sqrt[n]{2})]).

As (n) approaches infinity, each term in the sum approaches (\ln(2 - 1) = \ln(1) = 0).

Therefore, the overall limit is (0).

Sign up to view the whole answer

By signing up, you agree to our Terms of Service and Privacy Policy

Sign up with email
Answer from HIX Tutor

When evaluating a one-sided limit, you need to be careful when a quantity is approaching zero since its sign is different depending on which way it is approaching zero from. Let us look at some examples.

When evaluating a one-sided limit, you need to be careful when a quantity is approaching zero since its sign is different depending on which way it is approaching zero from. Let us look at some examples.

When evaluating a one-sided limit, you need to be careful when a quantity is approaching zero since its sign is different depending on which way it is approaching zero from. Let us look at some examples.

When evaluating a one-sided limit, you need to be careful when a quantity is approaching zero since its sign is different depending on which way it is approaching zero from. Let us look at some examples.

Not the question you need?

Drag image here or click to upload

Or press Ctrl + V to paste
Answer Background
HIX Tutor
Solve ANY homework problem with a smart AI
  • 98% accuracy study help
  • Covers math, physics, chemistry, biology, and more
  • Step-by-step, in-depth guides
  • Readily available 24/7