What did Jefferson do because he was concerned with the number of Federalists working in the government?

Answer 1

He tried to scuttle some signed-but-not-delivered Adams appointments, resulting in Marbury v. Madison.

On his way out of office, John Adams (the first and last Federalist president) signed appointments for 58 judges (16 circuit judges and 42 justices of the peace), all Federalists. He did not have time to deliver the appointments.

Thomas Jefferson, from the opposing Democratic Republican Party, discarded the appointments and made some of his own. One of the Adams appointees, William Marbury, sued James Madison, the Jefferson-appointed Secretary of State, for not delivering his five-year appointment as a judge in the District of Columbia.

After two years of lawsuits, the Supreme Court took up the case. their decision was murky: They agreed that Marbury had a right to the appointment, but that Madison had an equally compelling right not to deliver the appointment letters. They also used this case to establish the Supreme Court as the final arbiter in the constitutionality of new laws, a power not explicitly mentioned in the constitution.

On paper, Marbury won. In practical terms, Madison won. Ultimately, the Supreme Court succeeded in a naked power grab and was the biggest winner.

Sign up to view the whole answer

By signing up, you agree to our Terms of Service and Privacy Policy

Sign up with email
Answer 2

Jefferson, concerned with the number of Federalists working in the government, initiated a policy of reducing the size and influence of the federal government. He aimed to replace Federalist appointees with Democratic-Republican supporters, particularly in key positions such as federal judgeships and other government offices. This effort included reducing the size of the military, cutting federal spending, and repealing certain taxes and tariffs implemented by the Federalists. Additionally, Jefferson sought to limit the power of the federal government in favor of states' rights and individual liberties, reflecting his political philosophy of Democratic-Republicanism.

Sign up to view the whole answer

By signing up, you agree to our Terms of Service and Privacy Policy

Sign up with email
Answer from HIX Tutor

When evaluating a one-sided limit, you need to be careful when a quantity is approaching zero since its sign is different depending on which way it is approaching zero from. Let us look at some examples.

When evaluating a one-sided limit, you need to be careful when a quantity is approaching zero since its sign is different depending on which way it is approaching zero from. Let us look at some examples.

When evaluating a one-sided limit, you need to be careful when a quantity is approaching zero since its sign is different depending on which way it is approaching zero from. Let us look at some examples.

When evaluating a one-sided limit, you need to be careful when a quantity is approaching zero since its sign is different depending on which way it is approaching zero from. Let us look at some examples.

Not the question you need?

Drag image here or click to upload

Or press Ctrl + V to paste
Answer Background
HIX Tutor
Solve ANY homework problem with a smart AI
  • 98% accuracy study help
  • Covers math, physics, chemistry, biology, and more
  • Step-by-step, in-depth guides
  • Readily available 24/7