Three metallic plates each of area A are kept as shown in figure and charges #q_1,q_2,q_3# are given to them find the resulting charge distribution on the six surfaces , neglecting edge effect ?

Answer 1

The charges on the faces a, b, c ,d, e and f are
#q_a =1/2(q_1+q_2+q_3), q_b = 1/2(q_1-q_2-q_3),#
#q_c =1/2(-q_1+q_2+q_3), q_d = 1/2(q_1+q_2-q_3),#
#q_e =1/2(-q_1-q_2+q_3), q_f = 1/2(q_1+q_2+q_3)#

The electric field in each region can be found using Gauss law and superposition. Assuming the area of each plate to be #A#, the electric field caused by the charge #q_1# alone is #q_1/{2 epsilon_0 A}# directed away from the plate on both of its sides. Similarly, we can find out the fields due to each charge separately and use superposition to find the net fields in each region.

The figure above shows the the fields when only one of the three plates are charged, in succession, on the left and : the total fields, derived using superposition, on the right.

Once we have the fields, the charges on each faces can be easily found from Gauss law. For example, taking a Gaussian surface in the form of a right cylinder that has one of its circular faces inside the leftmost conducting plate, and the other one sticking out in the region to the left of it, will give you the surface charge density on the face #a#.

Sign up to view the whole answer

By signing up, you agree to our Terms of Service and Privacy Policy

Sign up with email
Answer 2

The resulting charge distribution on the six surfaces of the metallic plates can be found using the principle of conservation of charge. Since the system is in electrostatic equilibrium, the total charge on each plate will be redistributed in such a way that the electric field inside each plate is zero.

For the top plate:

  • Top surface: (q_1 + q_2 + q_3)
  • Bottom surface: (0)

For the middle plate:

  • Top surface: (q_1 + q_2)
  • Bottom surface: (-q_1 - q_2)

For the bottom plate:

  • Top surface: (q_1)
  • Bottom surface: (-q_1)

The charges on the side surfaces can be neglected due to the assumption of neglecting edge effects.

Sign up to view the whole answer

By signing up, you agree to our Terms of Service and Privacy Policy

Sign up with email
Answer from HIX Tutor

When evaluating a one-sided limit, you need to be careful when a quantity is approaching zero since its sign is different depending on which way it is approaching zero from. Let us look at some examples.

When evaluating a one-sided limit, you need to be careful when a quantity is approaching zero since its sign is different depending on which way it is approaching zero from. Let us look at some examples.

When evaluating a one-sided limit, you need to be careful when a quantity is approaching zero since its sign is different depending on which way it is approaching zero from. Let us look at some examples.

When evaluating a one-sided limit, you need to be careful when a quantity is approaching zero since its sign is different depending on which way it is approaching zero from. Let us look at some examples.

Not the question you need?

Drag image here or click to upload

Or press Ctrl + V to paste
Answer Background
HIX Tutor
Solve ANY homework problem with a smart AI
  • 98% accuracy study help
  • Covers math, physics, chemistry, biology, and more
  • Step-by-step, in-depth guides
  • Readily available 24/7