The successive ionization energies of an element A are as follows?


If the IE(1) and IE(3) values are #(27\text{KJ})/\text{mole}# and #(51\text{KJ})/\text{mole}# respectively , then the value of IE(2) is in #(\text{KJ})/\text{mole}#?

A) #21#
B)#33#
C)#59#
D)#63#

Answer 1

#IE_1 < IE_2 < IE_3#
OPTION B

clearly the energy required to knock out second electron will be less than the energy required to knock out the third electron(due to increasing effective nuclear charge with each electron gone) .

Hence #IE_2#< 51 KJ/mole. And similarly more energy is required to knock out the second electron than the energy required to knock out the outermost valence electron. Hence #IE_2#< 27 KJ/mole The only option which matches both the criteria is Option B

**

Sign up to view the whole answer

By signing up, you agree to our Terms of Service and Privacy Policy

Sign up with email
Answer 2

Would we not expect it to be #B#...?

On the basis of simple electrostatics (forgot for the moment about energy levels), would we not expect the SECOND oxidation of an element to be GREATER than the first, and LESS than the THIRD...?

#M(g) + Delta_1 rarr M^(+)(g)+e^(-)#

#M(g)^+ + Delta_2 rarr M^(2+)(g)+e^(-)#

And likewise...

#M(g)^(2+) + Delta_3 rarr M^(3+)(g)+e^(-)#

And as chemists, as physical scientists, we are obliged to consider the data... Consider successive ionizations represented by the graph...

Do these data support or detract from our argument?

Sign up to view the whole answer

By signing up, you agree to our Terms of Service and Privacy Policy

Sign up with email
Answer 3

To provide an accurate answer, I would need the specific values of the successive ionization energies of the element A. These values are typically given in kilojoules per mole (kJ/mol) or electron volts (eV). Once I have these values, I can help analyze the trends and patterns in the successive ionization energies of the element A. Without the specific values, it's not possible to provide a comprehensive answer. Please provide the values, and I'll be happy to assist you further.

Sign up to view the whole answer

By signing up, you agree to our Terms of Service and Privacy Policy

Sign up with email
Answer from HIX Tutor

When evaluating a one-sided limit, you need to be careful when a quantity is approaching zero since its sign is different depending on which way it is approaching zero from. Let us look at some examples.

When evaluating a one-sided limit, you need to be careful when a quantity is approaching zero since its sign is different depending on which way it is approaching zero from. Let us look at some examples.

When evaluating a one-sided limit, you need to be careful when a quantity is approaching zero since its sign is different depending on which way it is approaching zero from. Let us look at some examples.

When evaluating a one-sided limit, you need to be careful when a quantity is approaching zero since its sign is different depending on which way it is approaching zero from. Let us look at some examples.

Not the question you need?

Drag image here or click to upload

Or press Ctrl + V to paste
Answer Background
HIX Tutor
Solve ANY homework problem with a smart AI
  • 98% accuracy study help
  • Covers math, physics, chemistry, biology, and more
  • Step-by-step, in-depth guides
  • Readily available 24/7