Prove that for an ideal-gas reaction, #(dlnK_C^@)/(dT) = (DeltaU^@)/(RT^2)#?

I found this question particularly difficult, but I figured it out and wanted to share.

Answer 1
For an ideal gas reaction, we begin with the definition of #K_C^@#
#K_C^@ = K_P^@((P^@)/(RTc^@))^(Deltan)#
and differentiate #lnK_C^@# with respect to #T#. We would obtain, noting the usage of the product rule on #K_P^@ = e^(-DeltaG^@/(RT))# (since #DeltaG^@ = DeltaG^@(T)#):
#(dlnK_C^@)/(dT)#
#= d/(dT)[ln{e^(-(DeltaG^@)/(RT))((P^@)/(RTc^@))^(Deltan)}]#
#= d/(dT)[-(DeltaG^@)/(RT) + Deltanln((P^@)/(RTc^@))]#
#= d/(dT)[-(DeltaG^@)/(RT)] + Deltan(cancel(RTc^@)/cancel(P^@))*-cancel(P^@)/(cancel(Rc^@)T^cancel(2))#
#= stackrel("Product Rule")overbrace((DeltaG^@)/(RT^2) - 1/(RT)(dDeltaG^@)/(dT)) - (Deltan)/T#
By definition, since #DeltaG^@# is defined for a fixed #"1 bar"# pressure, we can refer to the Maxwell relation
#dG^@ = -S^@dT + VdP^@#

or

#dDeltaG^@ = -DeltaS^@dT + DeltaVdP^@#

and obtain

#((delDeltaG^@)/(delT))_(P^@) = (dDeltaG^@)/(dT) = -DeltaS^@#
Then we proceed to acquire the result by noting that #DeltaG^@ = DeltaH^@ - TDeltaS^@#, and that for an ideal gas, #DeltaH^@ = DeltaU^@ + Delta(PV) = DeltaU^@ + DeltanRT#:
#=> (DeltaG^@)/(RT^2) + (DeltaS^@)/(RT) - (Deltan)/T = (DeltaG^@)/(RT^2) + (TDeltaS^@)/(RT^2) - (DeltanRT)/(RT^2)#
#= (DeltaG^@ + TDeltaS^@ - DeltanRT)/(RT^2) = (DeltaH^@ - cancel(TDeltaS^@ + TDeltaS^@) - DeltanRT)/(RT^2)#
#= (DeltaU^@ + Delta(PV) - DeltanRT)/(RT^2) = (DeltaU^@ + cancel(DeltanRT) - cancel(DeltanRT))/(RT^2)#
#= color(blue)((DeltaU^@)/(RT^2))#
Sign up to view the whole answer

By signing up, you agree to our Terms of Service and Privacy Policy

Sign up with email
Answer 2

For an ideal-gas reaction, ΔU^@ = ΔH^@. Using the Van't Hoff equation, ln(K_C^@2/K_C^@1) = -(ΔH^@/R)(1/T^2_2 - 1/T^2_1). Take the derivative of both sides with respect to T and solve for (dlnK_C^@)/(dT) to get (DeltaU^@)/(RT^2).

Sign up to view the whole answer

By signing up, you agree to our Terms of Service and Privacy Policy

Sign up with email
Answer from HIX Tutor

When evaluating a one-sided limit, you need to be careful when a quantity is approaching zero since its sign is different depending on which way it is approaching zero from. Let us look at some examples.

When evaluating a one-sided limit, you need to be careful when a quantity is approaching zero since its sign is different depending on which way it is approaching zero from. Let us look at some examples.

When evaluating a one-sided limit, you need to be careful when a quantity is approaching zero since its sign is different depending on which way it is approaching zero from. Let us look at some examples.

When evaluating a one-sided limit, you need to be careful when a quantity is approaching zero since its sign is different depending on which way it is approaching zero from. Let us look at some examples.

Not the question you need?

Drag image here or click to upload

Or press Ctrl + V to paste
Answer Background
HIX Tutor
Solve ANY homework problem with a smart AI
  • 98% accuracy study help
  • Covers math, physics, chemistry, biology, and more
  • Step-by-step, in-depth guides
  • Readily available 24/7