Is it possible to for an integral in the form #int_a^oo f(x)\ dx#, and #lim_(x->oo)f(x)!=0#, to still be convergent?

If you view the integral as the area under the curve, it seems logical that there is no way that the integral
#int_a^oo f(x)\ dx#
would converge unless #f(x)# eventually tends to zero
#lim_(x->oo)f(x)=0#
since the area under the graph wouldn't be bounded otherwise.

My question is, are there integrals where this is not the case? Where the limit of the function doesn't go to zero, but the integral is still convergent? What would be an example of such function?

Answer 1

Yes, it is possible for an integral in the form ∫ₐ^∞ f(x) dx, where limₓ→∞ f(x) ≠ 0, to still be convergent if the function f(x) decreases fast enough as x approaches infinity. This can occur when f(x) approaches zero at a rate that compensates for its divergence to infinity, allowing the integral to converge. This behavior is often observed in functions with exponential decay or other rapidly decreasing functions.

Sign up to view the whole answer

By signing up, you agree to our Terms of Service and Privacy Policy

Sign up with email
Answer 2
If the limit #lim_(x->oo) f(x) = L# exists, then #L=0# is a necessary (but not sufficient) condition for the integral to converge.
In fact suppose #L > 0#: for the permanence of the sign, we can find a number #epsilon > 0# and a number #M# such that:
#f(x) >= epsilon # for #x > M#

So:

#int_a^t f(x) dx = int_a^M f(t)dt + int_M^t f(x)dx#

and based on a well known inequality:

#int_a^t f(x) dx >= I_0 +epsilon(t-M)#
which clearly diverges for #t->oo#.
If #L < 0# we can apply the same to #-f(x)#
For the same reason, also if #f(x) > 0# or #f(x) < 0# for #x >= M# then #lim_(x->oo) f(x) = 0# is a necessary condition.
However, if #lim_(x->oo) f(x)# does not exist and the function does not have a definite sign around #+oo# the condition is not necessary.

Can't find a counterexample right now, though.

Sign up to view the whole answer

By signing up, you agree to our Terms of Service and Privacy Policy

Sign up with email
Answer from HIX Tutor

When evaluating a one-sided limit, you need to be careful when a quantity is approaching zero since its sign is different depending on which way it is approaching zero from. Let us look at some examples.

When evaluating a one-sided limit, you need to be careful when a quantity is approaching zero since its sign is different depending on which way it is approaching zero from. Let us look at some examples.

When evaluating a one-sided limit, you need to be careful when a quantity is approaching zero since its sign is different depending on which way it is approaching zero from. Let us look at some examples.

When evaluating a one-sided limit, you need to be careful when a quantity is approaching zero since its sign is different depending on which way it is approaching zero from. Let us look at some examples.

Not the question you need?

Drag image here or click to upload

Or press Ctrl + V to paste
Answer Background
HIX Tutor
Solve ANY homework problem with a smart AI
  • 98% accuracy study help
  • Covers math, physics, chemistry, biology, and more
  • Step-by-step, in-depth guides
  • Readily available 24/7