In nations such as Russia and Austria Hungary, how did nationalism become a divisive rather than unifying force?
Each nation wanted independence, have their own country
They were(and still are) multiple nations in those countries. Nationalism gave them the power and the will to ask for what they thought they were supossed to have (a.k.a become a sovereign country)
By signing up, you agree to our Terms of Service and Privacy Policy
In nations such as Russia and Austria-Hungary, nationalism became a divisive force due to several factors. Firstly, these empires were multi-ethnic and comprised diverse populations with different languages, cultures, and historical backgrounds. Nationalist movements within these regions often sought to promote the interests of specific ethnic or cultural groups, leading to tensions and conflicts between different communities.
Secondly, the ruling authorities in these empires often pursued policies that suppressed or marginalized minority groups in favor of the dominant ethnic or cultural elites. This fueled resentment and resistance among marginalized communities, leading to further divisions along ethnic and national lines.
Additionally, the rise of nationalist ideologies in these regions coincided with broader geopolitical developments, such as the decline of empires and the emergence of new nation-states. Competing nationalist aspirations and territorial claims exacerbated tensions and conflicts within these multi-ethnic empires, ultimately contributing to their disintegration.
Furthermore, external influences, such as foreign interventions and alliances, also played a role in exacerbating nationalist sentiments and divisions within these empires. Imperial rivalries and conflicts often exploited nationalist grievances to advance geopolitical interests, further fueling instability and fragmentation within these regions.
Overall, nationalism in nations like Russia and Austria-Hungary became a divisive force due to the complex interplay of historical, cultural, political, and geopolitical factors, which exacerbated ethnic tensions, marginalized minority groups, and ultimately contributed to the disintegration of these multi-ethnic empires.
By signing up, you agree to our Terms of Service and Privacy Policy
When evaluating a one-sided limit, you need to be careful when a quantity is approaching zero since its sign is different depending on which way it is approaching zero from. Let us look at some examples.
When evaluating a one-sided limit, you need to be careful when a quantity is approaching zero since its sign is different depending on which way it is approaching zero from. Let us look at some examples.
When evaluating a one-sided limit, you need to be careful when a quantity is approaching zero since its sign is different depending on which way it is approaching zero from. Let us look at some examples.
When evaluating a one-sided limit, you need to be careful when a quantity is approaching zero since its sign is different depending on which way it is approaching zero from. Let us look at some examples.
- How did the Communists gain control of China?
- What are similarities between Jim Crow laws and Apartheid?
- What were the economic, political, and social causes for WWII in Europe?
- What is a proxy war and give two examples of them during the cold war?
- What was the purpose of the policy of appeasement pursued by France and Britain during the 1930s?
- 98% accuracy study help
- Covers math, physics, chemistry, biology, and more
- Step-by-step, in-depth guides
- Readily available 24/7