In division by a fraction why is it that we invert and then multiply? I posted this question so that I could explain why this works.

Answer 1

An alternate but similar approach added.

What does a fraction when represented as #a/b# mean? By definition it means for any two numbers #a and b#, with the condition that #b!=0#
#a# divided by #b# or symbolically
#=>a -: b# ........(1)
We also know that #a/b# can also be written as
#a" multipled by "1/ b# or symbolically
#=>axx1/ b# .....(2)

For expressions in lines (1) and (2) to be equal

#a -: b-=axx1/ b#

This is same as saying that

#"division is multiplication with the reciprocal"#
Sign up to view the whole answer

By signing up, you agree to our Terms of Service and Privacy Policy

Sign up with email
Answer 2

See the demonstration in the explanation

Solution 1 of 2
Also see my equivalent using algebra. (2 of 2)

#color(blue)("Preamble")#
Consider the example #1/4 -:1/8 = 2#
This is the same as:#" "(1/4color(magenta)(xx1))-:1/8=2#
#(1/4color(magenta)(xx2/2))-:1/8=2#
#(1xx2)/(4xx2)-:1/8=2#
#2/8-:1/8=2#
#color(brown)("Notice that if we just have the numerators it gives the same answer")#
#2-:1=2#
#color(brown)("However, for direct division of numerators to work the denominators must be the same")#
'~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ #color(blue)("Using an example to demonstrate the principle")#

Selecting numbers that are obviously different.

Suppose we had: #color(brown)([2/4])color(green)(-:8/6)#
Change the 4 in #color(brown)([2/4]# such that it is in #6^("ths")" instead " -> color(red)(4)xx6/4#

For multiply or divide, what we do to the bottom we do to the top.

#color(brown)([(2xx6/4)/(4xx6/4)]) -:8/6#
Now that both the denominators are in #6^("ths")# we can ignore them and just consider the numerators.
#2xx6/4 -:8" "->" "2-:8xx6/4#
#2/8xx6/4" "->" "(2xx6)/(8xx4)#

Swap the 8 and 4 round

#(2xx6)/(4xx8)" "=" "color(brown)(2/4)color(green)(xx6/8)#
#color(purple)("The "8/6" has now been inverted and the divide ")# #color(purple)("has become multiply. The principle has been demonstrated.")#
Sign up to view the whole answer

By signing up, you agree to our Terms of Service and Privacy Policy

Sign up with email
Answer 3

See below for an alternate (perhaps more abstract) explanation than the one provided by Tony.

In part this question deals with what it means to divide.

In general #color(red)(a) div color(blue)(b) = color(magenta)(k)# means #color(red)(a)# is equivalent to #color(blue)(b)# "pieces" each of size #color(magenta)(k)# or#color(white)("XXX")color(red)(a)=color(magenta)k xx color(blue)(b)#
When dividing by a fraction, say #color(blue)(p/q)# instead of #color(blue)(b)# we could write #color(white)("XX")color(red)(a)divcolor(blue)(p/q)=color(magenta)(k)# meaning #color(white)("XX")color(red)(a)=color(magenta)(k)xxcolor(blue)(p/q)#
Provided #color(green)(q/p)!=0# we also know that we can multiply both sides of an equation by #color(green)(q/p)# and the equation will remain valid.
So #color(white)("XXX")color(red)(a)xxcolor(green)(q/p) = color(magenta)(k)xxcolor(blue)(cancel(p)/cancel(q)) xx color(green)(cancel(q)/cancel(p)#
and since from our original specification that #color(red)(a)divcolor(blue)(p/q)=color(magenta)(k)# it follows that #color(white)("XXX")color(red)(a) divcolor(blue)(p/q)=color(red)(a)xxcolor(green)(q/p)#
Sign up to view the whole answer

By signing up, you agree to our Terms of Service and Privacy Policy

Sign up with email
Answer 4

#color(magenta)("I added this for completeness of my solution")#

#color(magenta)("It is a general solution")#
Solution 2 of 2
Also see my equivalent using numbers ( 1 of 2)

Suppose we hade #color(blue)(a/b -: c/d)# Making the denominators so that they are all #d#
#color(blue)([a/bxx1]-:c/d)#
#color(blue)([(axx d/b)/(bxxd/b)] -:c/d)# '................................................................................... Note that: #" "bxxd/b" " ->" " b/bxxd" " ->" " 1xxd" "=" "d# '......................................................................................

This becomes

#color(blue)([(axxd/b)/d] -:c/d)#

This gives the same answer as:

#color(blue)(axxd/b -:c)rarr" compare to "[4/8-:2/8]=2=[4-:2]#
#color(blue)(axxd/bxx1/c)#
#color(blue)(a/bxxd/c)#
#color(green)("Notice that the "-:c/d " has now become "xxd/c)#
#color(magenta)("Thus the rule, invert and multiply is true")#
Sign up to view the whole answer

By signing up, you agree to our Terms of Service and Privacy Policy

Sign up with email
Answer 5

The explanation is really simple...

Consider first #24div3#

What we are actually asking is "

If I have 24 of anything, how many groups can I make with 3 in each group?"

This could be shown like this: 24 = 1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1 = (1+1+1)+(1+1+1)+(1+1+1)+(1+1+1)+(1+1+1)+(1+1+1)+(1+1 +1)+(1+1+1)

We can see that 8 possible groups can be made.

#24 div 3 = 8#
What about #4 div 1/2?#
We are asking how many groups can be made with #1/2# in each?
#4 = 1/2+1/2+1/2+1/2+1/2+1/2+1/2+1/2" "larr# there are 8
This is because each #1# has two halves in it and #4 xx2 =8#
What about #6 div 3/4?#
We are asking " how many groups of #3/4# can be made from 6"? First we need to change #6# into quarters, and then group them into threes.

Each 1 has four quarters in it.

#6 = 6 xx4 = 24# quarters

"How many groups of 3 quarters can be made from 24 quarters?"

#6 = (1/4+1/4+1/4)+(1/4+1/4+1/4)+(1/4+1/4+1/4)+(1/4+1/4+1/4)+(1/4+1/4+1/4)+(1/4+1/4+1/4)+(1/4+1/4+1/4)+(1/4+1/4+1/4)#

There are 8 groups with three quarters in each.

#6 div 3/4 = 8#
What did we do? We changed everything into quarters by multiplying by 4 and then divided by 3 to make groups of #3/4#
#6 div 3/4 = 6 xx4 div 3#
# = 6 xx4/3#
#=8#
In the same way. #4 div 2/5#
Make everything into fifths by #xx5#, then #div2# to make groups of #2/5#
#4 div 2/5 = 4 xx5 div 2#
#=4 xx5/2#
#=20/2#
#=10#
Sign up to view the whole answer

By signing up, you agree to our Terms of Service and Privacy Policy

Sign up with email
Answer 6

When dividing by a fraction, you invert the fraction and then multiply because it is equivalent to multiplying by the reciprocal of the fraction. This works because division by a fraction is the same as multiplying by its reciprocal, which is obtained by flipping the fraction upside down.

Sign up to view the whole answer

By signing up, you agree to our Terms of Service and Privacy Policy

Sign up with email
Answer from HIX Tutor

When evaluating a one-sided limit, you need to be careful when a quantity is approaching zero since its sign is different depending on which way it is approaching zero from. Let us look at some examples.

When evaluating a one-sided limit, you need to be careful when a quantity is approaching zero since its sign is different depending on which way it is approaching zero from. Let us look at some examples.

When evaluating a one-sided limit, you need to be careful when a quantity is approaching zero since its sign is different depending on which way it is approaching zero from. Let us look at some examples.

When evaluating a one-sided limit, you need to be careful when a quantity is approaching zero since its sign is different depending on which way it is approaching zero from. Let us look at some examples.

Not the question you need?

Drag image here or click to upload

Or press Ctrl + V to paste
Answer Background
HIX Tutor
Solve ANY homework problem with a smart AI
  • 98% accuracy study help
  • Covers math, physics, chemistry, biology, and more
  • Step-by-step, in-depth guides
  • Readily available 24/7