If #e=(1+klamda)/(k(1-lambda))#, #0<lamda<1/2# and e is the coefficient of restitution, deduce that #k>1#?

I thought about putting this in Algebra since this is what it boils down to, but since its a collision problem and #e# is the coefficient of restitution, I thought it belongs in Physics more.

The original problem was:

A smooth sphere S of mass #m# is moving with speed #u# on a smooth horizontal plane. The sphere S collides with another smooth sphere T, of equal radius to S but of mass #km#, moving in the same straight line and in the same direction with speed #lamdau#, #0< lamda<1/2# . The coefficient of restitution between S and T is #e#.

Given that S is brought to rest by the impact, show that #e=(1+klamda)/(k(1-lambda))#. [I did this bit fine]

Deduce that #k>1#

Thank you!

Answer 1

See below

Regarding this collision:

# e lt 1 #
#implies (1 + k lambda)/(k(1 - lambda)) lt 1#
#k > 0 # and #lambda < 1/2 implies 1 - lambda > 0 #, ie the denominator is always positive, so we can make the next step whilst guaranteeing the same inequality sign:
#1 + k lambda lt k(1 - lambda) #
#implies 1 lt k(1 - 2 lambda) qquad square #
#lambda < 1/2 implies 1 - 2 lambda > 0 #, so we can divide and guarantee the same inequality sign in #square#:
#implies k > 1/(1 - 2 lambda)#
Because #0 < lambda < 1/2# then:
#0 <2 lambda < 1#
#0 > - 2 lambda > -1#
#1 >1 - 2 lambda > 0#
#color(blue)(0 < 1 - 2 lambda < 1)#
So: #k = (1)/("a number between 0 and 1") implies k > 1#
Sign up to view the whole answer

By signing up, you agree to our Terms of Service and Privacy Policy

Sign up with email
Answer 2
Given the expression for the coefficient of restitution \(e = \frac{1 + \lambda}{k(1 - \lambda)}\) and the condition \(0 < \lambda < \frac{1}{2}\), deducing that \(k > 1\) involves analyzing the denominator. For \(e\) to be valid, the denominator \(k(1 - \lambda)\) must be nonzero, leading to the conclusion that \(k > 1\).
Sign up to view the whole answer

By signing up, you agree to our Terms of Service and Privacy Policy

Sign up with email
Answer from HIX Tutor

When evaluating a one-sided limit, you need to be careful when a quantity is approaching zero since its sign is different depending on which way it is approaching zero from. Let us look at some examples.

When evaluating a one-sided limit, you need to be careful when a quantity is approaching zero since its sign is different depending on which way it is approaching zero from. Let us look at some examples.

When evaluating a one-sided limit, you need to be careful when a quantity is approaching zero since its sign is different depending on which way it is approaching zero from. Let us look at some examples.

When evaluating a one-sided limit, you need to be careful when a quantity is approaching zero since its sign is different depending on which way it is approaching zero from. Let us look at some examples.

Not the question you need?

Drag image here or click to upload

Or press Ctrl + V to paste
Answer Background
HIX Tutor
Solve ANY homework problem with a smart AI
  • 98% accuracy study help
  • Covers math, physics, chemistry, biology, and more
  • Step-by-step, in-depth guides
  • Readily available 24/7