How do you calculate the ionization energy of lithium?
By using a computer... we obtained a value of
Lithium clearly has more than one electron; that makes it so the ground-state energy is not readily able to be calculated by hand, since the electronic coordinates are mutually dependent due to the inherent electron-electron correlation.
Instead, we would have to supply input files to a computer software and calculate the ground-state energies that way, of
Using the so-called Feller-Peterson-Dixon method to get practically perfect accuracy, one would have to calculate (or consider):
#DeltaE_"IE" = DeltaE_("IE",0) + DeltaE_"corr" + DeltaE_"CBS" + DeltaE_"CV" + DeltaE_"QED" + DeltaE_"SR" + DeltaE_"SO" + DeltaE_"Gaunt"# where:
#DeltaE_("IE",0)# is the initial ionization energy calculated from Multi-Configurational Self-Consistent Field (MCSCF) theory.#DeltaE_"corr"# is the dynamic correlation energy contribution not accounted for in Multi-Configurational Self-Consistent Field theory, but recovered in Multi-Reference Configuration Interaction (MRCI).#DeltaE_"CBS"# is the energy contribution from extrapolating to the limit of an infinite set of basis functions that represent atomic orbitals.#DeltaE_"CV"# is the energy contribution from correlating the core electrons with the valence electron(s).#DeltaE_"QED"# is the energy contribution from the so-called Lamb Shift, a quantum electrodynamics interaction present primarily among#s# orbitals.#DeltaE_"SR"# is the energy contribution from relativistic effects. This is negligible in#"Li"# but is automatically accounted for using the 2nd order Douglas-Kroll-Hess (DKH) Hamiltonian for light atoms (3rd order DKH for heavy atoms).#DeltaE_"SO"# is the energy contribution from spin-orbit coupling.#DeltaE_"Gaunt"# is the energy contribution from high-order two-electron correlation in the relativistic scheme.
That WOULD be extremely involved for a heavier atom... Here are some things that save time:
- No electron correlation is present here since only one state is possible (spin up in a
#2s# orbital!).So we can get by from a simple Hartree-Fock calculation. There will be a tiny bit of core-valence (
#1s"-"2s# ) correlation, so#DeltaE_"CV" ne 0# and that can be taken care of with an MRCI using a weighted-core basis set.-
The model potentials for QED only are made for
#Z >= 23# (quote: "Fails completely for#Z < 23# "), so there is no point in including the Lamb Shift at all. -
#DeltaE_"SR"# is included by default by the 2nd order DKH Hamiltonian. -
The
#DeltaE_"SO"# contribution can be included but it has been done before... It is#"0.000041 eV"# , or#"0.000945 kcal/mol"# . Gaunt is unimportant here, based on how small the spin-orbit value is.
Here are the (not so interesting) results:
From this, we had gotten that:
#color(blue)(DeltaE_"IE") = "123.195465 kcal/mol" + "0.000000 kcal/mol" + "0.000000 kcal/mol" + "1.162450 kcal/mol" + "0.000000 kcal/mol" + "accounted for" + "0.000945 kcal/mol" + "0.000000 kcal/mol"# #=# #color(blue)(ul"124.358860 kcal/mol")# #=# #color(blue)(ul"5.39271223 eV")# whereas the value on NIST is practically the same, at
#5.39171495 (pm 0.00000004) "eV"# , a mere#0.01849%# error... -
By signing up, you agree to our Terms of Service and Privacy Policy
The ionization energy of lithium can be calculated using the formula:
Ionization energy = -RH * (Z^2 / n^2)
Where:
- RH is the Rydberg constant (2.18 × 10^-18 J)
- Z is the atomic number of the element (3 for lithium)
- n is the principal quantum number of the electron being removed
Substitute the values and solve for the ionization energy.
By signing up, you agree to our Terms of Service and Privacy Policy
When evaluating a one-sided limit, you need to be careful when a quantity is approaching zero since its sign is different depending on which way it is approaching zero from. Let us look at some examples.
When evaluating a one-sided limit, you need to be careful when a quantity is approaching zero since its sign is different depending on which way it is approaching zero from. Let us look at some examples.
When evaluating a one-sided limit, you need to be careful when a quantity is approaching zero since its sign is different depending on which way it is approaching zero from. Let us look at some examples.
When evaluating a one-sided limit, you need to be careful when a quantity is approaching zero since its sign is different depending on which way it is approaching zero from. Let us look at some examples.

- 98% accuracy study help
- Covers math, physics, chemistry, biology, and more
- Step-by-step, in-depth guides
- Readily available 24/7