How do you find the square root of 74889?

Answer 1

Here's another method for finding rational approximations...

For interest, here's another idea for finding rational approximations to #sqrt(74889)#.

To begin with, observe that:

#sqrt(a^2+b) = a+b/(2a+b/(2a+b/(2a+b/(2a+...))))#
Given that #274# is the closest integer approximation, with #274^2 = 75076 = 74889 + 187#, we can write a generalised continued fraction for the square root, putting #a=274# and #b=-187# to get:
#sqrt(74889) = 274-187/(548-187/(548-187/(548-187/(548-...))))#
This is related to #274+sqrt(74889)# being one of the zeros of:
#(x-274-sqrt(74889))(x-274+sqrt(74889)) = x^2-548x+187#

Now consider the following recursively defined sequence:

#{ (a_0 = 0), (a_1 = 1), (a_(n+2) = 548a_(n+1)-187a_n" for "n >= 0):}#

The initial terms are:

#0, 1, 548, 300117, 164361640, 90014056841, 49296967522188#
Because of the way it is constructed, the ratio between pairs of successive terms tends to #274+sqrt(74889)#. In fact each successive ratio corresponds to truncating the continued fraction after one more term.
So we can use this sequence to get successively better approximations to #sqrt(74889)#, such as:
#sqrt(74889) ~~ 164361640/300117 - 274 ~~ 273.6585465#
Sign up to view the whole answer

By signing up, you agree to our Terms of Service and Privacy Policy

Sign up with email
Answer 2

The simplest form of the square root is #3sqrt(8321)#

We can find approximations such as:

#sqrt(74889) ~~ 273.659#

As stated:

#74889#
Notice that the sum of the digits is divisible by #9#. That is:
#7+4+8+8+9 = 36 = 4*9#
So #74889# is divisible by #9# (#=3^2#) too:
#74889 = 9 * 8321#
#8321# is less easy to factorise, but eventually you might find:
#8321=53*157#
In fact, to check for square factors we only needed to look for prime factors up to #19#, since #20# and #21# are composite and:
#21^3 = 9261 > 8321#

The square root can be expressed in its most basic form as follows since there are no more square factors:

#sqrt(74889) = sqrt(3^2*8321) = sqrt(3^2)*sqrt(8321) = 3sqrt(8321)#

Although we are unable to express this number as a fraction due to its irrationality, we can find reasonable approximations:

As stated:

#74889#

First, divide the right digits into pairs:

#7"|"48"|"89"#

Take note of this:

#2^2 = 4 < 7 < 9 = 3^2#

Thus:

#2 < sqrt(7) < 3#

additionally:

#200 < sqrt(74889) < 300#

If we know a few more square roots, we can add the next two digits and note that for a more accurate estimate:

#27^2 = 729 < 748 < 784 = 28^2#

Thus:

#270 < sqrt(74889) < 280#

Between these limits, we can linearly interpolate to find:

#sqrt(74889) ~~ 270+10*(74889 - 72900)/(78400-72900) = 270+10*1989/5500 ~~ 273.6#
Let us choose #274# as an approximation.
Given an approximation #a# for the square root of a number #n#, a better approximation is given by:
#(a^2+n)/(2a)#
So in our case, putting #n=74889# and #a=274# we find:
#sqrt(74889) ~~ (274^2+74889)/(2*274) = (75076+74889)/548 = 149965/548 ~~ 273.659#

Repeat with this new approximation if we want even more accuracy; the number of correct significant digits will approximately double with each iteration.

Sign up to view the whole answer

By signing up, you agree to our Terms of Service and Privacy Policy

Sign up with email
Answer 3

#sqrt74889~~273.658#

As #74889# is not a perfect square, to find the square root of #74889#, we should do a special long division, where we pair, the numbers in two, starting from decimal point in either direction. When we group them we do so starting from #89#, then #48# and then #7#.
Here for #7#, the number whose square is just less than it, is #2#, whose square is #4# and so we write #4# below #7#. The difference is #3# and now we bring down next two digits #48#. As a divisor we first write double of #2# i.e. #4# and then find a number #x# so that #4x# (here #x# stands for single digit in units place) multiplied by #x# is just less than the number, here #348#. We find for #x=7#, we have #47xx7=329# and get the difference as #19#.
Next we bring down next two digits #89# and we have #1989#. Recall we had brought as divisor #2xx2=4#, but this time we have #27# double of which is #54#, so we make the divisor as #54x#, selecting an #x# so that #54x# multiplied with #x#, just goes in #1989# and this is #3#, for which we get #543xx3=1629# and have a remainder #360#.
Now as we still have a remainder of #360#, for more accuracy, we bring #00# after decimal point. Also put decimal after #273#.
We continue in similar way by bringing down #00#, which makes it #36000# and continue as shown till we have desired accuracy. You can see the details below, where we have gone up to three decimal places.
#color(white)(xX)2color(white)(xx)7color(white)(xx)3color(white)(xx).6color(white)(xx)5color(white)(xx)8# #ul2|bar(7)color(white)(.)bar(48)color(white)(.)bar(89).color(white)(.)bar(00)color(white)(.)bar(00)color(white)(.)bar(00)# #color(white)(XX)ul(4)color(white)(.)darr# #color(red)(4)7|3color(white)(X)48# #color(white)(xxx)ul(3color(white)(..)29)# #color(white)(x)color(red)(54)3|color(white)(.)19color(white)(x)89# #color(white)(xxx.xx)ul(16color(white)(.)29)# #color(white)(x)color(red)(546)6|color(white)(.)3color(white)(.)60color(white)(.)00# #color(white)(xxxxxx)ul(3color(white)(.)27color(white)(.)96)# #color(white)(xx)color(red)(5472)5|color(white)()32color(white)(.)04color(white)(.)00# #color(white)(xxXxxxx)ul(27color(white)(.)36color(white)(.)25# #color(white)(xx)color(red)(54730)8|4color(white)(.)67color(white)(.)75color(white)(.)00# #color(white)(xxxxxxxx)ul(4color(white)(.)37color(white)(.)84color(white)(.)64# #color(white)(xxxxxxxxx.)29color(white)(.)90color(white)(.)36#
Hence #sqrt74889~~273.658#
Sign up to view the whole answer

By signing up, you agree to our Terms of Service and Privacy Policy

Sign up with email
Answer 4
Sign up to view the whole answer

By signing up, you agree to our Terms of Service and Privacy Policy

Sign up with email
Answer from HIX Tutor

When evaluating a one-sided limit, you need to be careful when a quantity is approaching zero since its sign is different depending on which way it is approaching zero from. Let us look at some examples.

When evaluating a one-sided limit, you need to be careful when a quantity is approaching zero since its sign is different depending on which way it is approaching zero from. Let us look at some examples.

When evaluating a one-sided limit, you need to be careful when a quantity is approaching zero since its sign is different depending on which way it is approaching zero from. Let us look at some examples.

When evaluating a one-sided limit, you need to be careful when a quantity is approaching zero since its sign is different depending on which way it is approaching zero from. Let us look at some examples.

Not the question you need?

Drag image here or click to upload

Or press Ctrl + V to paste
Answer Background
HIX Tutor
Solve ANY homework problem with a smart AI
  • 98% accuracy study help
  • Covers math, physics, chemistry, biology, and more
  • Step-by-step, in-depth guides
  • Readily available 24/7