How do you find the Limit of #x+3# as #x->2# and then use the epsilon delta definition to prove that the limit is L?

Answer 1

See below.

To evaluate, we can simply take the limit by substituting #2# in for #x#, and we then have #(2+3)=5#.
Now, prove #lim_(x->2)x+3=5#.

The epsilon delta proof for limits is easier understood when one is familiar with the definitions of the terms involved. Most useful will be the definition of the limit of a function.

#lim_(x->c)f(x)=L#

Definition:

for every #epsilon>0#, there exists #delta>0# such that #abs(f(x)-L)< epsilon# whenever #0< abs(x-c)< delta#.

In our case:

We then need to find an expression for #delta# so that the definition, and consequently the proof, holds. In other words, we need:
#abs(x+3-5)< epsilon" "# when #" "0< abs(x-2)< delta#

So:

#abs(x-2)< epsilon#
Since the concept of the limit only applies when #x# is close to #a#, we will need to restrict #x# so that it is at most #1# away from #a#, or: #abs(x-a) <1#. For us, that is #abs(x-2)< 1#.
In this case, we have #x-2# for both cases, so we need not evaluate both.

Then we know that we must have:

#abs(x-2)< delta=epsilon#
#=>delta=epsilon#

Note that all of the above steps come from the definition of the limit of a function as provided above.

Since we have #delta=epsilon# and both cases were the same, the proof will be pretty short.
Proof. Let #epsilon>0# be arbitrary and let #delta=epsilon#. If #-1 < abs(x-2)< delta#, then #abs((x+3)-2)=abs(x-2) <1#; hence:
#abs(x-2) <1#
#<= delta=epsilon" " square#
Sign up to view the whole answer

By signing up, you agree to our Terms of Service and Privacy Policy

Sign up with email
Answer 2

To find the limit of x+3 as x approaches 2, we substitute the value of x into the expression x+3, which gives us 2+3=5.

To prove that the limit is L using the epsilon-delta definition, we need to show that for any given epsilon (ε) greater than 0, there exists a corresponding delta (δ) greater than 0 such that if 0 < |x-2| < δ, then |(x+3)-L| < ε.

Let's assume L = 5.

Now, we need to find a suitable delta that satisfies the condition.

Given ε > 0, we want to find δ > 0 such that if 0 < |x-2| < δ, then |(x+3)-5| < ε.

Simplifying the expression, we have |x-2| < δ implies |x-2| < ε.

Since we want to find a delta that satisfies this condition, we can choose δ = ε.

Now, if 0 < |x-2| < δ = ε, then |(x+3)-5| = |x-2| < ε.

Therefore, we have shown that for any given ε > 0, there exists a corresponding δ > 0 (in this case, δ = ε) such that if 0 < |x-2| < δ, then |(x+3)-5| < ε.

Hence, using the epsilon-delta definition, we have proven that the limit of x+3 as x approaches 2 is indeed 5.

Sign up to view the whole answer

By signing up, you agree to our Terms of Service and Privacy Policy

Sign up with email
Answer from HIX Tutor

When evaluating a one-sided limit, you need to be careful when a quantity is approaching zero since its sign is different depending on which way it is approaching zero from. Let us look at some examples.

When evaluating a one-sided limit, you need to be careful when a quantity is approaching zero since its sign is different depending on which way it is approaching zero from. Let us look at some examples.

When evaluating a one-sided limit, you need to be careful when a quantity is approaching zero since its sign is different depending on which way it is approaching zero from. Let us look at some examples.

When evaluating a one-sided limit, you need to be careful when a quantity is approaching zero since its sign is different depending on which way it is approaching zero from. Let us look at some examples.

Not the question you need?

Drag image here or click to upload

Or press Ctrl + V to paste
Answer Background
HIX Tutor
Solve ANY homework problem with a smart AI
  • 98% accuracy study help
  • Covers math, physics, chemistry, biology, and more
  • Step-by-step, in-depth guides
  • Readily available 24/7