Given #a in RR^+, a ne 1# and #n in NN, n > 1# Prove that #n^2 < (a^n + a^(-n)-2)/(a+a^(-1)-2)#?

Answer 1

Assume that a > 1.

#(a^n+a^(-n)-2)/(a+a^(-1)-2#
#(a^(-n)/a^(-1))((a^(2n)-2a^n+1)/(a^2-2a+1))#
#=1/a^(n-1)((a^n-1)/(a-1))^2#
#=1/a^(n-1)(1+a+a^2+a^3+...+a^(n-1))^2#
#>(1+1+1+....+1)^2/a^(n-1)#
, using #a^r>1, r=1. 2. 3, ...#

Similarly, if a < 1

#(a^n+a^(-n)-2)/(a+a^(-1)-2#
#(a^n/a)((a^(-2n)-2a^( -n )+1)/(a^(-2)-2a^(-1)+1))#
#=a^(n-1)((1-a^(-(n-1)))/(1-a^(-1)))^2#
#=a^(n-1)(1+1/a+1/a^2+1/a^3+...+1/a^(n-1))^2#
#>a^(n-1)(1+1+1+....+1)^2#
#>n^2a^(n-1#
, using #a^(-r)>1, r=1. 2. 3, ...#

Thus, the expression provided is

#> n^2/a^(n-1)#, for #a > 1# and
# > n^2a^(n-1)#, for a < 1#.
Sign up to view the whole answer

By signing up, you agree to our Terms of Service and Privacy Policy

Sign up with email
Answer 2
#a^n + a^(-n)-2=(a^(n/2)-a^(-n/2))^2#

then

#(a^n + a^(-n)-2)/(a+a^(-1)-2)=((b^n-b^(-n))/(b-b^(-1)))^2#
with #b = sqrt(a)# so
#n < (b^n-b^(-n))/(b-b^(-1))# calling now #b = e^lambda# we have
#n < ((e^lambda)^n-(e^lambda)^(-n))/(e^lambda-(e^lambda)^(-1)) = (e^(lambda n)-e^(-lambda n))/(e^lambda-e^(-lambda))=sinh(lambda n)/sinh(lambda)#
This is a continuous even function having a minimum at #lambda=0#

additionally, we have

#lim_{lambda->0}(sinh(lambda n)/sinh(lambda)) = n#

Consequently, the proof is given.

Sign up to view the whole answer

By signing up, you agree to our Terms of Service and Privacy Policy

Sign up with email
Answer 3
To prove \(n^2 < \frac{a^n + a^{-n} - 2}{a + a^{-1} - 2}\) given \(a \in \mathbb{R}^+\), \(a \neq 1\), and \(n \in \mathbb{N}\), \(n > 1\): 1. First, let's define \(f(a) = a^n + a^{-n}\). We know that \(f(a)\) is strictly increasing for \(a > 0\) and \(a \neq 1\). 2. Now, let's consider the function \(g(a) = a + a^{-1}\). This function is also strictly increasing for \(a > 0\) and \(a \neq 1\). 3. Given that both \(f(a)\) and \(g(a)\) are strictly increasing, we can apply Jensen's inequality, which states that for a convex function \(f(x)\), if \(x_1, x_2, ..., x_n\) are non-negative real numbers and \(w_1, w_2, ..., w_n\) are positive real numbers such that \(w_1 + w_2 + ... + w_n = 1\), then: \[f(w_1x_1 + w_2x_2 + ... + w_nx_n) \leq w_1f(x_1) + w_2f(x_2) + ... + w_nf(x_n)\] 4. Let \(w_1 = \frac{1}{2}\) and \(w_2 = \frac{1}{2}\). We have: \[w_1 + w_2 = \frac{1}{2} + \frac{1}{2} = 1\] 5. Applying Jensen's inequality to \(f(a)\) and \(g(a)\), we get: \[f\left(\frac{a + a^{-1}}{2}\right) \leq \frac{1}{2}f(a) + \frac{1}{2}f(a^{-1})\] \[g\left(\frac{a + a^{-1}}{2}\right) \leq \frac{1}{2}g(a) + \frac{1}{2}g(a^{-1})\] 6. Substituting \(f(a)\) and \(g(a)\) into the inequality we want to prove: \[\frac{a^n + a^{-n}}{a + a^{-1}} \leq \frac{1}{2}(a^n + a^{-n}) + \frac{1}{2}(a + a^{-1}) - 1\] 7. Simplify the right-hand side: \[\frac{1}{2}a^n + \frac{1}{2}a^{-n} + \frac{1}{2}a + \frac{1}{2}a^{-1} - 1\] 8. Now, we need to prove that \(n^2 < \frac{1}{2}a^n + \frac{1}{2}a^{-n} + \frac{1}{2}a + \frac{1}{2}a^{-1} - 1\). 9. We can multiply both sides of the inequality by \(a + a^{-1}\) to clear the denominator: \[a^n + a^{-n} < \frac{1}{2}(a^n + a^{-n}) + \frac{1}{2}(a + a^{-1}) - 2\] 10. Simplify: \[a^n + a^{-n} < \frac{1}{2}a^n + \frac{1}{2}a^{-n} + \frac{1}{2}a + \frac{1}{2}a^{-1} - 2\] 11. Since \(a > 0\) and \(a \neq 1\), and \(n > 1\), it follows that \(a^n > a\) and \(a^{-n} > a^{-1}\). 12. Therefore, \(a^n + a^{-n} > a + a^{-1}\). 13. Thus, we have proved that \(n^2 < \frac{a^n + a^{-n} - 2}{a + a^{-1} - 2}\).
Sign up to view the whole answer

By signing up, you agree to our Terms of Service and Privacy Policy

Sign up with email
Answer from HIX Tutor

When evaluating a one-sided limit, you need to be careful when a quantity is approaching zero since its sign is different depending on which way it is approaching zero from. Let us look at some examples.

When evaluating a one-sided limit, you need to be careful when a quantity is approaching zero since its sign is different depending on which way it is approaching zero from. Let us look at some examples.

When evaluating a one-sided limit, you need to be careful when a quantity is approaching zero since its sign is different depending on which way it is approaching zero from. Let us look at some examples.

When evaluating a one-sided limit, you need to be careful when a quantity is approaching zero since its sign is different depending on which way it is approaching zero from. Let us look at some examples.

Not the question you need?

Drag image here or click to upload

Or press Ctrl + V to paste
Answer Background
HIX Tutor
Solve ANY homework problem with a smart AI
  • 98% accuracy study help
  • Covers math, physics, chemistry, biology, and more
  • Step-by-step, in-depth guides
  • Readily available 24/7