Give the following, what should the scientist do next?

A scientist wanted to answer a question about life science. He formed a hypothesis, then he designed experiments. After conducting many experiments and analyzing his data, the scientist found that his hypothesis was not supported by his data.

Answer 1

Revise his thinking/understanding of the process and get more evidence to develop a new hypothesis.

His first hypothesis provided an answer to a specific question. It was not what he expected, but it is still new and valuable information.

The purpose of the scientific method is NOT to prove a point of view, but to provide enough valid evidence to make realistic decisions about the workings of the physical universe.

By signing up, you agree to our Terms of Service and Privacy Policy

Answer 2

Avery Adams

To provide a meaningful answer, I would need to know the specific context or details of what the scientist is dealing with or investigating. Without that information, it's impossible to suggest the next course of action. Could you please provide more details or specify the scenario?

By signing up, you agree to our Terms of Service and Privacy Policy

Answer from HIX Tutor

When evaluating a one-sided limit, you need to be careful when a quantity is approaching zero since its sign is different depending on which way it is approaching zero from. Let us look at some examples.