Consider the following model steel bridge. What would the real bridge weigh and would the real bridge sag?
Consider a model steel bridge that is 1/100 the exact scale of the real bridge that is to be built. If the model bridge weighs 50 N, what will the real bridge weigh? If the model bridge does not appear to sag under its own weight, is this evidence the real bridge, built exactly to scale, will not appear to sag either?
Consider a model steel bridge that is 1/100 the exact scale of the real bridge that is to be built. If the model bridge weighs 50 N, what will the real bridge weigh? If the model bridge does not appear to sag under its own weight, is this evidence the real bridge, built exactly to scale, will not appear to sag either?
Because of the 'square-cube rule', the bridge will be 10,000 times as strong as the model but weigh 1 million times more. The fact that the model does not appear to sag does not guarantee that the bridge will not appear to sag.
This demonstrates the'square-cube rule' in action: when objects change in size, their cross-sectional area (and surface area) changes as the length squares, while their volume (and, if the materials' densities are the same, their mass) changes as the length cubes.
The fact that the model does not appear to sag does not guarantee that the bridge will not appear to sag because it is 10,000 times stronger than the model but 1 million times heavier.
By signing up, you agree to our Terms of Service and Privacy Policy
The weight of the real bridge would depend on various factors, including the dimensions, materials used, and design specifications. Whether the real bridge sags depends on the bridge's structural integrity, load-bearing capacity, and the materials employed in its construction. Detailed engineering analysis is required to determine the specific weight and structural behavior of the actual bridge.
By signing up, you agree to our Terms of Service and Privacy Policy
When evaluating a one-sided limit, you need to be careful when a quantity is approaching zero since its sign is different depending on which way it is approaching zero from. Let us look at some examples.
When evaluating a one-sided limit, you need to be careful when a quantity is approaching zero since its sign is different depending on which way it is approaching zero from. Let us look at some examples.
When evaluating a one-sided limit, you need to be careful when a quantity is approaching zero since its sign is different depending on which way it is approaching zero from. Let us look at some examples.
When evaluating a one-sided limit, you need to be careful when a quantity is approaching zero since its sign is different depending on which way it is approaching zero from. Let us look at some examples.
- A truck pulls boxes up an incline plane. The truck can exert a maximum force of #3,500 N#. If the plane's incline is #(5 pi )/8 # and the coefficient of friction is #3/7 #, what is the maximum mass that can be pulled up at one time?
- An object with a mass of #18 kg# is on a plane with an incline of # -(5 pi)/12 #. If it takes #9 N# to start pushing the object down the plane and #5 N# to keep pushing it, what are the coefficients of static and kinetic friction?
- If a #2 kg# object moving at #9 m/s# slows down to a halt after moving #2 m#, what is the friction coefficient of the surface that the object was moving over?
- How fast will an object with a mass of #6 kg# accelerate if a force of #12 N# is constantly applied to it?
- An object with a mass of #9 kg# is acted on by two forces. The first is #F_1= < -2 N , -1 N># and the second is #F_2 = < 8 N, -5 N>#. What is the object's rate and direction of acceleration?
- 98% accuracy study help
- Covers math, physics, chemistry, biology, and more
- Step-by-step, in-depth guides
- Readily available 24/7