Carbon-14 has a half-life of 5770 years. If a fossil is 23,080 years old and it has 3kg of Carbon-14, how much carbon-14 did it originally have?

Answer 1

#"48 kg"#

The nuclear half-life of a radioactive isotope indicates how long it will take for a sample of the isotope to shrink to half its original size.

In essence, any sample you start with will be halved with every passing of a half-life. So if you start with a mass #A_0# of your isotope, you can say that you'll be left with
#A_0 * 1/2 = A_0/2 -># after one half-life
#A_0/2 * 1/2 = A_0/4 -># after two half-lives
#A_0/4 * 1/2 = A_0/8 -># after three half-lives
#vdots#

and so forth. Consequently, you can determine a correlation between the number of half-lives that have elapsed in a specific amount of time and the amount of your initial sample that remains undated.

#color(blue)(A = A_0 * 1/2^n)" "#, where
#A# - the amount left undecayed #n# - the number of half-lives that have passed
In your case, you know that the fossil is #"23,080"# years old and that carbon-14, the isotope of interest, has half-life of #"5,770"# years.

This implies that you calculate the number of half-lives that have elapsed during this duration.

#n = (23080 color(red)(cancel(color(black)("years"))))/(5770color(red)(cancel(color(black)("years")))) = 4#
So, you know that #"3.0 kg"# of carbon-14 are left undecayed after the passing of four half-lives, which means that the sample originally contained
#A = A_0 * 1/2^n implies A_0 = A * 2^n#
#A_0 = "3.0 kg" * 2^4 = color(green)("48 kg")#
Sign up to view the whole answer

By signing up, you agree to our Terms of Service and Privacy Policy

Sign up with email
Answer 2

To find the original amount of Carbon-14 in the fossil, we can use the formula for exponential decay: ( N(t) = N_0 \times (1/2)^{t/t_{\text{half-life}}} ), where ( N(t) ) is the amount of Carbon-14 present at time ( t ), ( N_0 ) is the initial amount of Carbon-14, ( t ) is the time elapsed, and ( t_{\text{half-life}} ) is the half-life of Carbon-14.

Given:

  • ( t_{\text{half-life}} = 5770 ) years
  • ( t = 23080 ) years
  • ( N(t) = 3 ) kg

Using the formula, we can solve for ( N_0 ):

[ 3 = N_0 \times (1/2)^{23080/5770} ]

[ 3 = N_0 \times (1/2)^{4} ]

[ 3 = N_0 \times (1/16) ]

[ N_0 = 3 \times 16 ]

[ N_0 = 48 ]

The fossil originally had 48 kg of Carbon-14.

Sign up to view the whole answer

By signing up, you agree to our Terms of Service and Privacy Policy

Sign up with email
Answer 3

To determine how much carbon-14 the fossil originally had, we can use the concept of exponential decay and the formula for calculating the amount of a substance remaining after a certain amount of time has passed.

Given that carbon-14 has a half-life of 5770 years, we can use the formula:

[ N = N_0 \times (0.5)^{\frac{t}{t_{\frac{1}{2}}}} ]

Where:

  • ( N ) is the amount of substance remaining after time ( t ).
  • ( N_0 ) is the initial amount of the substance.
  • ( t ) is the elapsed time.
  • ( t_{\frac{1}{2}} ) is the half-life of the substance.

Substituting the given values:

  • ( N = 3 ) kg (amount remaining after 23,080 years)
  • ( t = 23,080 ) years
  • ( t_{\frac{1}{2}} = 5770 ) years

We can solve for ( N_0 ), the initial amount of carbon-14:

[ 3 = N_0 \times (0.5)^{\frac{23080}{5770}} ]

[ 3 = N_0 \times (0.5)^4 ]

[ 3 = N_0 \times (0.0625) ]

[ N_0 = \frac{3}{0.0625} ]

[ N_0 = 48 ] kg

Therefore, the fossil originally had 48 kg of carbon-14.

Sign up to view the whole answer

By signing up, you agree to our Terms of Service and Privacy Policy

Sign up with email
Answer from HIX Tutor

When evaluating a one-sided limit, you need to be careful when a quantity is approaching zero since its sign is different depending on which way it is approaching zero from. Let us look at some examples.

When evaluating a one-sided limit, you need to be careful when a quantity is approaching zero since its sign is different depending on which way it is approaching zero from. Let us look at some examples.

When evaluating a one-sided limit, you need to be careful when a quantity is approaching zero since its sign is different depending on which way it is approaching zero from. Let us look at some examples.

When evaluating a one-sided limit, you need to be careful when a quantity is approaching zero since its sign is different depending on which way it is approaching zero from. Let us look at some examples.

Not the question you need?

Drag image here or click to upload

Or press Ctrl + V to paste
Answer Background
HIX Tutor
Solve ANY homework problem with a smart AI
  • 98% accuracy study help
  • Covers math, physics, chemistry, biology, and more
  • Step-by-step, in-depth guides
  • Readily available 24/7