An object, previously at rest, slides #8 m# down a ramp, with an incline of #pi/12 #, and then slides horizontally on the floor for another #3 m#. If the ramp and floor are made of the same material, what is the material's kinetic friction coefficient?

Answer 1

#mu_k = 0.193#

WARNING: LONG-ish ANSWER!

We're asked to find the coefficient of kinetic friction, #mu_k#, between the object and the ramp.

We'll split this problem into two parts: the first part is where the object is sliding down the incline, and the second part is where it is sliding across the floor.

#-----------bb("INCLINE")-----------#

The only two forces acting on the object as it slides down the ramp are

  1. The gravitational force (its weight; acting down the ramp)

  2. The kinetic friction force (acting up the ramp because it opposes motion)

    The expression for the coefficient of kinetic friction #mu_k# is

    #ul(f_k = mu_kn#

    where

    • #f_k# is the magnitude of the retarding kinetic friction force acting as it slides down (denoted #f# in the above image)

    • #n# is the magnitude of the normal force exerted by the incline, equal to #mgcostheta# (denoted #N# in the above image)

      The expression for the net horizontal force, which I'll call #sumF_(1x)#, is

      #ul(sumF_(1x) = overbrace(mgsintheta)^"gravitational force" - overbrace(color(red)(f_k))^"kinetic friction force"#

      Since #color(red)(f_k = mu_kn)#, we have

      #sumF_(1x) = mgsintheta - color(red)(mu_kn)#

      And since the normal force #n = mgcostheta#, we can also write

      #ul(sumF_(1x) = mgsintheta - color(red)(mu_kmgcostheta)#

      Or

      #ul(sumF_(1x) = mg(sintheta - mu_kcostheta))#

      #" "#

      Using Newton's second law, we can find the expression for the acceleration #a_(1x)# of the object as it slides down the incline:

      #ul(sumF_(1x) = ma_(1x)#

      #color(red)(a_(1x)) = (sumF_(1x))/m = (mg(sintheta - mu_kcostheta))/m = color(red)(ul(g(sintheta - mu_kcostheta)#

      #" "#

      What we can now do is apply a constant-acceleration equation to find the final velocity as it exits the ramp, which we'll call #v_(1x)#:

      #ul((v_(1x))^2 = (v_(0x))^2 + 2(a_(1x))(Deltax_"ramp")#

      where

      • #v_(0x)# is the initial velocity (which is #0# since it was "previously at rest")

      • #a_(1x)# is the acceleration, which we found to be #color(red)(g(sintheta - mu_kcostheta)#

      • #Deltax_"ramp"# is the distance it travels down the ramp

        Plugging in these values:

        #(v_(1x))^2 = (0)^2 + 2color(red)(g(sintheta - mu_kcostheta))(Deltax_"ramp")#

        #" "#
        #ul(v_(1x) = sqrt(2color(red)(g(sintheta - mu_kcostheta))(Deltax_"ramp"))#

        This velocity is also the initial velocity of the motion along the floor.

        #-----------bb("FLOOR")-----------#

        As the object slides across the floor, the plane is perfectly horizontal, so the normal force #n# now equals

        #n = mg#

        The only horizontal force acting on the object is the retarding kinetic friction force

        #f_k = mu_kn = mu_kmg#

        (which is different than the first one).

        The net horizontal force on the object on the floor, which we'll call #sumF_(2x)#, is thus

        #ul(sumF_(2x) = -f_k = -mu_kmg#

        (the friction force is negative because it opposes the object's motion)

        Using Newton's second law again, we can find the floor acceleration #a_(2x)#:

        #color(green)(a_(2x)) = (sumF_(2x))/m = (-mu_kmg)/m = color(green)(ul(-mu_kg#

        #" "#

        We can now use the same constant-acceleration equation as before, with only a slight difference in the variables:

        #ul((v_(2x))^2 = (v_(1x))^2 + 2(a_(2x))(Deltax_"floor")#

        where this time

        • #v_(2x)# is the final velocity, which since it comes to rest will be #0#

        • #v_(1x)# is the initial velocity, which we found to be #sqrt(2color(red)(g(sintheta - mu_kcostheta))(Deltax_"ramp")#

        • #a_(2x)# is the acceleration, which we found to be #color(green)(-mu_kg#

        • #Deltax_"floor"# is the distance it travels along the floor

          Plugging in these values:

          #(0)^2 = [sqrt(2color(red)(g(sintheta - mu_kcostheta))(Deltax_"ramp"))color(white)(l)]^2 + 2(color(green)(-mu_kg))(Deltax_"floor")#

          Rearranging gives

          #2(color(green)(mu_kg))(Deltax_"floor") = 2color(red)(g(sintheta - mu_kcostheta))(Deltax_"ramp")#

          #" "#

          At this point, we're just solving for #mu_k#, which the following indented portion covers:

          Divide both sides by #2g#:

          #mu_k(Deltax_"floor") = (sintheta - mu_kcostheta)(Deltax_"ramp")#

          Distribute:

          #mu_k(Deltax_"floor") = (Deltax_"ramp")sintheta - (Deltax_"ramp")mu_kcostheta#

          Now, we can divide all terms by #mu_k#:

          #Deltax_"floor" = ((Deltax_"ramp")sintheta)/(mu_k) - (Deltax_"ramp")costheta#

          Rearrange:

          #((Deltax_"ramp")sintheta)/(mu_k) = Deltax_"floor" + (Deltax_"ramp")costheta#

          Finally, swap #mu_k# and #Deltax_"floor" + (Deltax_"ramp")costheta#:

          #color(red)(ulbar(|stackrel(" ")(" "mu_k = ((Deltax_"ramp")sintheta)/(Deltax_"floor" + (Deltax_"ramp")costheta)" ")|)#

          #" "#

          The question gives us

          • #Deltax_"ramp" = 8# #"m"color(white)(al# (distance down ramp)

          • #Deltax_"floor" = 3# #"m"color(white)(aa# (distance along floor)

          • #theta = pi/12color(white)(aaaaaa.# (angle of inclination)

            Plugging these in:

            #color(blue)(mu_k) = ((8color(white)(l)"m")*sin((pi)/12))/(3color(white)(l)"m"+(8color(white)(l)"m")·cos((pi)/12)) = color(blue)(ulbar(|stackrel(" ")(" "0.193" ")|)#

            Notice how the coefficient doesn't depend on the mass #m# or gravitational acceleration #g# if the two surfaces are the same...

Sign up to view the whole answer

By signing up, you agree to our Terms of Service and Privacy Policy

Sign up with email
Answer 2

To solve for the kinetic friction coefficient, we first find the total distance traveled. The object slides 8 m down the ramp and then travels 3 m horizontally on the floor, resulting in a total distance of 8 m + 3 m = 11 m.

Next, we calculate the work done against friction. Since the object was previously at rest, all the work done against friction will be converted to kinetic energy. The work done against friction is equal to the force of friction multiplied by the distance traveled horizontally (3 m). Using the work-energy principle, this is also equal to the change in kinetic energy.

The change in kinetic energy is equal to the kinetic energy at the end of the motion minus the initial kinetic energy, which is zero since the object was previously at rest. Therefore, the change in kinetic energy is equal to the kinetic energy at the end of the motion.

The kinetic energy at the end of the motion is given by (1/2) * mass * velocity^2. Since the object slides horizontally on the floor, its velocity at the end of the motion is the final velocity, which we can calculate using kinematic equations.

Using the distance traveled horizontally (3 m), we can find the time it takes for the object to slide 3 m horizontally using the equation for uniformly accelerated motion: distance = (initial velocity * time) + (0.5 * acceleration * time^2). The initial velocity is the velocity acquired from sliding down the ramp, which we can find using the equations of motion for inclined planes.

Once we have the time it takes for the object to slide 3 m horizontally, we can use it to find the final velocity. With the final velocity, we can calculate the change in kinetic energy.

Finally, we equate the work done against friction to the change in kinetic energy and solve for the friction force. Then, we use the equation for friction force (friction force = friction coefficient * normal force) to find the friction coefficient. Since the object is on a horizontal surface, the normal force is equal to the weight of the object.

By substituting the known values into the equations, we can solve for the friction coefficient.

Sign up to view the whole answer

By signing up, you agree to our Terms of Service and Privacy Policy

Sign up with email
Answer from HIX Tutor

When evaluating a one-sided limit, you need to be careful when a quantity is approaching zero since its sign is different depending on which way it is approaching zero from. Let us look at some examples.

When evaluating a one-sided limit, you need to be careful when a quantity is approaching zero since its sign is different depending on which way it is approaching zero from. Let us look at some examples.

When evaluating a one-sided limit, you need to be careful when a quantity is approaching zero since its sign is different depending on which way it is approaching zero from. Let us look at some examples.

When evaluating a one-sided limit, you need to be careful when a quantity is approaching zero since its sign is different depending on which way it is approaching zero from. Let us look at some examples.

Not the question you need?

Drag image here or click to upload

Or press Ctrl + V to paste
Answer Background
HIX Tutor
Solve ANY homework problem with a smart AI
  • 98% accuracy study help
  • Covers math, physics, chemistry, biology, and more
  • Step-by-step, in-depth guides
  • Readily available 24/7