A pendulum of length L feet has a period of: #T= 3.14(L^.5)/2(2^.5)# seconds. If you increase the length of a 1-foot pendulum by .01 feet, how much does its period increase?

Answer 1

#(dT)/T = 0.5%#

Error propagation is easily handled using the #log# transformation. Given #T=pi/2sqrt(L/g)# after tansformation reads
#log_eT = log_e(pi/2) +1/2(log_eL-log_e g)#

After deriving we have

#(dT)/T = 1/2((dL)/L-(dg)/g)#
supposing that #g# is known with precision #(dg)/g approx 0#

so

#(dT)/T = 1/2(dL)/L = 1/2(0.01)/1 = 0.005#

or also

#(dT)/T = 0.5%#
Sign up to view the whole answer

By signing up, you agree to our Terms of Service and Privacy Policy

Sign up with email
Answer 2

#approx 1/2% # increase

see below

I'd normally expect #T = 2pi sqrt(L/g)#

you seem to have

#T(L) = pi/2 sqrt(2L)#, which is fine, might be to do with old imperial units and maybe a different gravity. we can work with that
So with #T_o = pi/2 sqrt(2L)# you want to know
#T(L + delta L) = pi/2 sqrt(2(L+ delta L))#

but by approximation

We can plough the same furrow as Newton (and Taylor expansions), but in a way that is simpler, using a generalised binomial expansion, ie this idea

#(1+ h)^alpha = 1 + alpha h + (alpha(alpha-1))/(2!) h^2 + O(h^3) qquad abs h < 1 qquad alpha in mathcal(R), notin mathcal(Z^+)#

It looks just like a Taylor Expansion, ie based in Calculus. In fact I think it was Newton that generalised the binomial expansion in this way.

So

#T(L + delta L) = pi/2 sqrt(2(L+ delta L))#
#= pi/2 sqrt(2L) (1+ (delta L)/L)^(1/2) " where "qquad abs ((delta L)/L) " << " 1#

which is simply

#T_o (1+ (delta L)/L)^(1/2) #
#=T_o (1+ 1/2 (delta L)/L + O(deltaL^2) )#
#approxT_o (1+ 1/2 (delta L)/L )#
#= T_o (1+ (delta L)/(2L) )#
#= T_o (1+ 0.005 )#

That is a c.1/2% increase

Sign up to view the whole answer

By signing up, you agree to our Terms of Service and Privacy Policy

Sign up with email
Answer 3

App. increase in period #T# is #(pisqrt2)/400 "sec"#.

#"App." % "increase in" T=1/2 %#.

The Period #T# (in sec.) of a pendulum of Length #L# (in feet) is given by the Formula,
#T=(pi/2)sqrt(2L)#
Let #deltaT# denote increase in #T#, and, #delta L# in #L#,
Then, from Calculus, we know that, #deltaT~=(dT)/(dL)*deltaL...(star)#
#T=(pi/2)sqrt(2L) rArr (dT)/(dL)=((pisqrt2)/2)(1/(2sqrtL))=(pisqrt2)/(4sqrtL)#.
#:. deltaT~=(pisqrt2)/(4sqrtL)deltaL.............[by(star)]#
Here, #L=1, deltaL=0.01#
#rArr deltaT~=(pisqrt2)/4*0.01=(pisqrt2)/400 "feet"#.
Thus, app. increase in period #T# is #(pisqrt2)/400 "sec"#.
Note that, when #L=1 "foot, period (initial)" T=(pisqrt2)/2 sec.#
Hence, #"app." % "increase in" T=((deltaT)/T)100#
#=((pisqrt2)/400)/((pisqrt2)/2)*100=1/2%#, as Respected Eddie has obtained !

Enjoy Mats.!

Sign up to view the whole answer

By signing up, you agree to our Terms of Service and Privacy Policy

Sign up with email
Answer 4

To find the increase in period when the length of a 1-foot pendulum is increased by 0.01 feet, you can use the formula for the period of a pendulum:

T = 3.14 * (L^0.5) / (2 * (2^0.5))

First, find the period of the original pendulum with a length of 1 foot:

T1 = 3.14 * (1^0.5) / (2 * (2^0.5)) = 3.14 * (1) / (2 * 1.414) = 3.14 / 2.828 ≈ 1.113 seconds

Now, find the period of the pendulum with a length increased by 0.01 feet:

New length = 1 + 0.01 = 1.01 feet

T2 = 3.14 * (1.01^0.5) / (2 * (2^0.5)) ≈ 3.14 * 1.00498756211 / 2.828 ≈ 1.114 seconds

The increase in period is the difference between T2 and T1:

Increase in period ≈ T2 - T1 ≈ 1.114 - 1.113 ≈ 0.001 seconds

So, the period increases by approximately 0.001 seconds.

Sign up to view the whole answer

By signing up, you agree to our Terms of Service and Privacy Policy

Sign up with email
Answer from HIX Tutor

When evaluating a one-sided limit, you need to be careful when a quantity is approaching zero since its sign is different depending on which way it is approaching zero from. Let us look at some examples.

When evaluating a one-sided limit, you need to be careful when a quantity is approaching zero since its sign is different depending on which way it is approaching zero from. Let us look at some examples.

When evaluating a one-sided limit, you need to be careful when a quantity is approaching zero since its sign is different depending on which way it is approaching zero from. Let us look at some examples.

When evaluating a one-sided limit, you need to be careful when a quantity is approaching zero since its sign is different depending on which way it is approaching zero from. Let us look at some examples.

Not the question you need?

Drag image here or click to upload

Or press Ctrl + V to paste
Answer Background
HIX Tutor
Solve ANY homework problem with a smart AI
  • 98% accuracy study help
  • Covers math, physics, chemistry, biology, and more
  • Step-by-step, in-depth guides
  • Readily available 24/7