A 0.125 M solution of a weak acid is 2.5% ionized, what is the dissociation constant #K_c# of the acid?

Reaction is
#HCN"(aq)"+H_2O"(l)"\rightleftharpoonsH_3O^{+}"(aq)"+CN^{-}"(aq)"#

Answer 1

Regarding the response of a common weak acid to water,

#"HA"(aq) + "H"_2"O"(l) rightleftharpoons "H"_3"O"^(+)(aq) + "A"^(-)(aq)#
If it is #2.5%# ionized, then the fraction of dissociation is #alpha = 0.025#. That is not #x#, whereas you have assumed that #x = alpha#. It cannot be true, because #x# is an absolute quantity, and #alpha# is a fraction, a relative quantity.
Writing the traditional ICE table for any initial concentration #["HA"]_i#:
#"HA"(aq) " "+" " "H"_2"O"(l) rightleftharpoons "H"_3"O"^(+)(aq) + "A"^(-)(aq)#
#"I"" "["HA"]_i" "" "" "color(white)(..)-" "" "" "0" "" "" "" "" "0# #"C"" "-x" "" "" "color(white)(....)-" "" "+x" "" "" "" "+x# #"E"" "["HA"]_i-x" "color(white)(..)-" "" "" "x" "" "" "" "" "x#

As a result, we established the standard mass action expression for monoprotic acid as:

#K_c = (["H"_3"O"^(+)]["A"^(-)])/(["HA"]) = (xcdotx)/(["HA"]_i - x)#
No approximations should be made here, because no #K_c# is known yet. All we need to do is define
#x = alpha cdot ["HA"]_i#,
i.e. the extent of dissociation #x# can be written in terms of the initial concentration of #"HA"# and the fraction of dissociation #alpha#.

We just have a straightforward conversion from percentage to decimal, so nothing new here:

#alpha = "percent ionization"/(100%)#

Consequently,

#K_c = (alpha["HA"]_i)^2/(["HA"]_i - alpha["HA"]_i)#
#= (alpha^2["HA"]_i^2)/((1-alpha)["HA"]_i)#
#= ((alpha^2)/(1-alpha))["HA"]_i#
As a result, we already have enough information to find #K_c#.
#color(blue)(K_c) = (0.025^2)/(1-0.025)(0.125)#
#= color(blue)(8.0_128 xx 10^(-5))#

where two significant figures are shown, with subscripts denoting digits past the final significant digit.

Another strategy is to be aware of the ionization percentage, which is:

"Percent ionization" is calculated as x/(["HA"]_i) xx 100%, or 2.5%.

That's what you were initially doing, so

#x = (2.5%)/(100%) xx ["HA"]_i = 0.025 cdot ["HA"]_i#
#= ul(alpha cdot ["HA"]_i)#

exactly as we previously defined. In this instance, we had

#x = 0.025 cdot "0.125 M" = "0.003125 M"#.

From this not too dissimilar method...

#color(blue)(K_c) = x^2/(0.125 - x)#
#= (0.003125^2)/(0.125-0.003125) = color(blue)(8.0_128 xx 10^(-5))#

We receive the same result.

Sign up to view the whole answer

By signing up, you agree to our Terms of Service and Privacy Policy

Sign up with email
Answer 2

The dissociation constant ( K_c ) for a weak acid (( HA )) is given by the expression:

[ K_c = \frac{[H^+][A^-]}{[HA]} ]

Given that the solution is 2.5% ionized, this means that 2.5% of the weak acid has dissociated into ( H^+ ) ions and ( A^- ) ions.

Let's assume that the initial concentration of the weak acid ( HA ) is ( C ). Then, after dissociation, the concentration of ( H^+ ) ions and ( A^- ) ions will both be ( 0.025C ) (since they are 2.5% of the initial concentration).

The concentration of the undissociated weak acid, ( [HA] ), will be ( C - 0.025C = 0.975C ).

Substituting these values into the expression for ( K_c ), we get:

[ K_c = \frac{(0.025C)(0.025C)}{0.975C} ]

[ K_c = \frac{0.000625C^2}{0.975C} ]

[ K_c = 0.000641C ]

Given that the initial concentration of the weak acid (( C )) is 0.125 M, we can substitute this value into the expression for ( K_c ):

[ K_c = 0.000641 \times 0.125 ]

[ K_c = 8.0125 \times 10^{-5} ]

So, the dissociation constant ( K_c ) of the weak acid is ( 8.0125 \times 10^{-5} ).

Sign up to view the whole answer

By signing up, you agree to our Terms of Service and Privacy Policy

Sign up with email
Answer from HIX Tutor

When evaluating a one-sided limit, you need to be careful when a quantity is approaching zero since its sign is different depending on which way it is approaching zero from. Let us look at some examples.

When evaluating a one-sided limit, you need to be careful when a quantity is approaching zero since its sign is different depending on which way it is approaching zero from. Let us look at some examples.

When evaluating a one-sided limit, you need to be careful when a quantity is approaching zero since its sign is different depending on which way it is approaching zero from. Let us look at some examples.

When evaluating a one-sided limit, you need to be careful when a quantity is approaching zero since its sign is different depending on which way it is approaching zero from. Let us look at some examples.

Not the question you need?

Drag image here or click to upload

Or press Ctrl + V to paste
Answer Background
HIX Tutor
Solve ANY homework problem with a smart AI
  • 98% accuracy study help
  • Covers math, physics, chemistry, biology, and more
  • Step-by-step, in-depth guides
  • Readily available 24/7