Why is there an exception in the ionization energy trend in the second-row p-block elements?
I think you are wondering why nitrogen has an ionization energy that locally peaks in the ionization energy chart:
(search for the atom one left of
#"O"# , nitrogen, which is atomic number#7# .)Nitrogen's atomic electron configuration is:
#[He]2s^2 2p^3# ,or more explicitly:
#ul(uarr color(white)(darr))" "ul(uarr color(white)(darr))" "ul(uarr color(white)(darr))#
#underbrace(" "" "" "" "" "" "" "" ")#
#" "" "" "2p#
#ul(uarr darr)#
#2s# All the electrons are unpaired, so that's not the exception here.
The exception arises with
#"O"# atom, which has a lower first ionization energy even though it is more electronegative, is expected to hold onto its valence electrons more tightly, and is also smaller in radius.This is due to the atomic electron configuration for
#"O"# :
#[He]2s^2 2p^4# or more explicitly:
#ul(uarr darr)" "ul(uarr color(white)(darr))" "ul(uarr color(white)(darr))#
#underbrace(" "" "" "" "" "" "" "" ")#
#" "" "" "2p#
#ul(uarr darr)#
#2s# One of the
#2p# valence electrons is paired, and that one experiences repulsions with the other#2p# electrons, since it is in the same orbital as another electron.That is enough to lower the first ionization energy of oxygen atom to be below that of nitrogen atom by about
#"86 kJ/mol"# .
By signing up, you agree to our Terms of Service and Privacy Policy
The exception in the ionization energy trend in the second-row p-block elements is due to the presence of half-filled and fully filled orbitals, which result in increased stability and lower ionization energy compared to what would be expected based solely on atomic size trends. Specifically, elements with a half-filled or fully filled subshell (such as nitrogen and oxygen) exhibit higher stability, resulting in lower ionization energy than the adjacent elements.
By signing up, you agree to our Terms of Service and Privacy Policy
When evaluating a one-sided limit, you need to be careful when a quantity is approaching zero since its sign is different depending on which way it is approaching zero from. Let us look at some examples.
When evaluating a one-sided limit, you need to be careful when a quantity is approaching zero since its sign is different depending on which way it is approaching zero from. Let us look at some examples.
When evaluating a one-sided limit, you need to be careful when a quantity is approaching zero since its sign is different depending on which way it is approaching zero from. Let us look at some examples.
When evaluating a one-sided limit, you need to be careful when a quantity is approaching zero since its sign is different depending on which way it is approaching zero from. Let us look at some examples.
- 98% accuracy study help
- Covers math, physics, chemistry, biology, and more
- Step-by-step, in-depth guides
- Readily available 24/7