If #K_c# at a certain temperature for twice the formation reaction of #"HF"(g)# in a sealed rigid #"10-L"# container is #1.0 xx 10^2#, and one starts with #"1.00 mol"# of each reactant, what are the concentrations at equilibrium for each species?

Answer 1
#["H"_2(g)]_(eq) = "0.017 M"#
#["F"_2(g)]_(eq) = "0.017 M"#
#["HF"(g)]_(eq) = "0.17 M"#

We can assume that all of the gases are perfect because of the high temperature (minimal intermolecular forces, complete kinetic energy transfer in collisions, etc.).

(The important thing to remember is that ideal gases exist at high temperatures; the precise temperature is not very important.)

We receive:

#"H"_2(g) + "F"_2(g) rightleftharpoons 2"HF"(g)#
#K_c = 1.0 xx 10^2#
We don't know what units are involved, but I assume it is #"mol/L"# since we are given #"1.00 mols"# of both reactants for initial mols and a vessel volume of #"10.0 L"#. This would give a molar concentration, #"mol"/"L"#, or #"M"#.

The volumes are all equal because the container is shared. Using molarity, create an ICE table (initial, change, equilibrium):

#"H"_2(g) " "+" " "F"_2(g) " "rightleftharpoons" " color(red)(2)"HF"(g)#
#"I"" "0.100" "" "" "0.100" "" "" "" "0.000#
#"C"" "-x" "" "" "-x" "" "" "" "+color(red)(2)x#
#"E"" "(0.100-x)" "(0.100-x)" "color(red)(2)x#
Remember that the mols in the reaction correspond to the multiple of molarity gained going towards equilibrium, so we have #+2x# for #"HF"#, and not just #+x#.
Since we have #K_c#, we just need to write its mass action expression:
#K_c = (["HF"]^color(red)(2))/(["H"_2]["F"_2])#
#= (color(red)(2)x)^color(red)(2)/((0.100-x)(0.100-x)) = (color(red)(2)x)^color(red)(2)/(0.100-x)^2 = 1.0 xx 10^2#
The #color(red)(2)# coefficient for #"HF"# again shows up in the exponent of the equilibrium constant, just as it does in the change in mols as #+color(red)(2)x#.
We are fortunate, since this is a perfect square. #1.0 xx 10^2 = 100#, so:
#sqrt100 = sqrt(K_c) = sqrt((color(red)(2)x)^color(red)(2)/(0.100-x)^2)#
#= (color(red)(2)x)/(0.100-x) = 10#
(we ignore the negative root since #K_c > 0#, always.

Thus:

#10(0.100-x) = 2x#
#=> 1.00 - 10x = 2x#
#=> 1.00 = 12x#
#=> x = 1.00/12 = 5/6 cdot 1/10 = 0.08bar(3)# #"mols/L"#

This implies that:

#color(blue)(["H"_2(g)]_(eq)) = 0.100 - 0.08bar(3) = color(blue)("0.017 M")#
#color(blue)(["F"_2(g)]_(eq)) = 0.100 - 0.08bar(3) = color(blue)("0.017 M")#
#color(blue)(["HF"(g)]_(eq)) = color(red)(2) xx 0.08bar(3) = color(blue)("0.17 M")#
This should make sense, since #K_c# was #100#, and indeed,
#K_c = (["HF"]_(eq)^color(red)(2))/(["H"_2]_(eq)["F"_2]_(eq)) = ("0.17 M")^2/(("0.017 M")("0.017 M"))#
#= cancel(("0.17 M")("0.17 M"))/(0.1cdotcancel("0.17 M")cdot0.1cdotcancel("0.17 M"))#
#= 1/(0.01)#
#= 100 = 1.0 xx 10^2#,

which was our initial point.

Sign up to view the whole answer

By signing up, you agree to our Terms of Service and Privacy Policy

Sign up with email
Answer 2

[ [HF]{\text{eq}} = \sqrt{K_c} = \sqrt{1.0 \times 10^2} = 10 , \text{M} ] [ [H_2]{\text{eq}} = [F_2]{\text{eq}} = \frac{x}{V} = \frac{x}{10} , \text{M} ] [ K_c = \frac{[HF]{\text{eq}}^2}{[H_2]{\text{eq}}[F_2]{\text{eq}}} ] [ 1.0 \times 10^2 = \frac{(10)^2}{\left(\frac{x}{10}\right)^2} ] [ x = 10 , \text{M} ] [ [H_2]{\text{eq}} = [F_2]{\text{eq}} = \frac{10}{10} = 1 , \text{M} ] [ [HF]_{\text{eq}} = 10 , \text{M} ] [ \text{At equilibrium: } [HF] = 10 , \text{M}, , [H_2] = 1 , \text{M}, , [F_2] = 1 , \text{M} ]

Sign up to view the whole answer

By signing up, you agree to our Terms of Service and Privacy Policy

Sign up with email
Answer from HIX Tutor

When evaluating a one-sided limit, you need to be careful when a quantity is approaching zero since its sign is different depending on which way it is approaching zero from. Let us look at some examples.

When evaluating a one-sided limit, you need to be careful when a quantity is approaching zero since its sign is different depending on which way it is approaching zero from. Let us look at some examples.

When evaluating a one-sided limit, you need to be careful when a quantity is approaching zero since its sign is different depending on which way it is approaching zero from. Let us look at some examples.

When evaluating a one-sided limit, you need to be careful when a quantity is approaching zero since its sign is different depending on which way it is approaching zero from. Let us look at some examples.

Not the question you need?

Drag image here or click to upload

Or press Ctrl + V to paste
Answer Background
HIX Tutor
Solve ANY homework problem with a smart AI
  • 98% accuracy study help
  • Covers math, physics, chemistry, biology, and more
  • Step-by-step, in-depth guides
  • Readily available 24/7