Why is this redox reaction not balanced? Please balance it. #"H"_2"SO"_4(aq) + "K"_2"Cr"_2"O"_7(aq) + "SO"_2(g) -> "Cr"_2"SO"_4(aq) + "H"_2"O"(l) + "K"_2"SO"(aq)#

Answer 1

There is a typo in your response, or there was an error wherever you looked. It should read:

#"H"_2"SO"_4(aq) + "K"_2"Cr"_2"O"_7(aq) + 3"SO"_2(g) -> "Cr"_2("SO"_4)_3(aq) + "H"_2"O"(l) + "K"_2"SO"_4(aq)#

Your Google search yielded an unbalanced number of oxygen atoms; trust but double check!

Your curiosity is admirable. :)

WARNING: LONG REPLY!

To keep things simple, let's start by looking at the reaction between sulfur dioxide and dichromate; we can add the potassium and sulfate counterions (but not the sulfate product) later.

Now, a few important terms to remember:

This demonstrates why the subsequent actions make sense:

This would come in handy in situations where you need to reuse the same half-reaction more than once. At my university, for instance, we do a series of permanganate reactions with each of the halides.

WRITE THE HALF-REACTION OF REDUCTION

Since we now know that dichromate was reduced (i.e., its oxidation state became less positive or its oxygen atom count dropped), the initial half-reaction might be as follows:

#"Cr"_2"O"_7^(2-)(aq) -> "Cr"^(3+)(aq)#
Of course, chromium could have been reduced to #"Cr"^(2+)# instead; we don't really know for sure, and this is one possible result that is based on your googled example. This diagram gives #"Cr"^(2+)# and #"Cr"^(0)# as other possibilities in acidic solution through experiencing a negative #E_"cell"#. We'll go with this result, because it's the process that matters. Now, follow the above steps.

Stabilize the atoms that aren't hydrogen or oxygen.

#"Cr"_2"O"_7^(2-)(aq) -> color(red)(2)"Cr"^(3+)(aq)#

The oxygen atoms now.

#"Cr"_2"O"_7^(2-)(aq) -> color(red)(2)"Cr"^(3+)(aq) + color(red)(7"H"_2"O"(l))#
Now, the hydrogen atoms that the water molecules added just skewed. Remember, we can add #"H"^(+)# since the solution is acidified.
#color(red)(14"H"^(+)(aq)) + "Cr"_2"O"_7^(2-)(aq) -> color(red)(2)"Cr"^(3+)(aq) + color(red)(7"H"_2"O"(l))#

Since every atom is in balance, we can now examine the charge.

#14(1^(+)) + (2^(-)) " vs. " 2(3^(+)) + 0#
#=> +12 " vs. " +6#
#=># add #6e^(-)# to the left side.
#color(green)(6e^(-) + 14stackrel(color(blue)(+1))("H"^(+))(aq) + stackrel(color(blue)(+6))("Cr"_2)stackrel(color(blue)(-2))("O"_7^(2-))(aq) -> 2stackrel(color(blue)(+3))("Cr"^(3+))(aq) + 7stackrel(color(blue)(+1))("H"_2)stackrel(color(blue)(-2))("O")(l))#
There, now this is a balanced reduction half-reaction! If you notice, I've also added in each atom's oxidation state at the end. We see that #stackrel(+6)("Cr") -> stackrel(+3)("Cr")#.

The oxidation half-reaction is the next thing we cover.

COMPOSING THE HALF-REACTION OF OXIDATION

Same procedure, but this time we start with writing this:

#"SO"_2(g) -> "SO"_4^(2-)(aq)#

Follow the same procedures as above to get:

#color(green)(2stackrel(color(blue)(+1))("H"_2)stackrel(color(blue)(-2))("O")(l) + stackrel(color(blue)(+4))("S")stackrel(color(blue)(-2))("O"_2)(g) -> stackrel(color(blue)(+6))("S")stackrel(color(blue)(-2))("O"_4^(2-))(aq) + 4stackrel(color(blue)(+1))("H"^(+))(aq) + 2e^(-))#
We see that #stackrel(+4)("S") -> stackrel(+6)("S")#.

ENTIRE REACTION

Now, we add the two half-reactions together, trying to cancel out the electrons. If we multiply the oxidation half-reaction by #3#, that works out.
#color(green)(cancel(6e^(-)) + 14stackrel(color(blue)(+1))("H"^(+))(aq) + stackrel(color(blue)(+6))("Cr"_2)stackrel(color(blue)(-2))("O"_7^(2-))(aq) -> 2stackrel(color(blue)(+3))("Cr"^(3+))(aq) + 7stackrel(color(blue)(+1))("H"_2)stackrel(color(blue)(-2))("O")(l))# #3(color(green)(2stackrel(color(blue)(+1))("H"_2)stackrel(color(blue)(-2))("O")(l) + stackrel(color(blue)(+4))("S")stackrel(color(blue)(-2))("O"_2)(g) -> stackrel(color(blue)(+6))("S")stackrel(color(blue)(-2))("O"_4^(2-))(aq) + 4stackrel(color(blue)(+1))("H"^(+))(aq) + cancel(2e^(-))))# #"-------------------------------------------------------------------------------"# #14"H"^(+)(aq) + "Cr"_2"O"_7^(2-)(aq) + 6"H"_2"O"(l) + 3"SO"_2(g) -> 2"Cr"^(3+)(aq) + 7"H"_2"O"(l) + 3"SO"_4^(2-)(aq) + 12"H"^(+)(aq)#

Now eliminate the substances that match on each side.

#stackrel(2)cancel(14)"H"^(+)(aq) + "Cr"_2"O"_7^(2-)(aq) + cancel(6"H"_2"O"(l)) + 3"SO"_2(g) -> 2"Cr"^(3+)(aq) + cancel(7)"H"_2"O"(l) + 3"SO"_4^(2-)(aq) + cancel(12"H"^(+)(aq))#
#=> color(blue)(2"H"^(+)(aq) + "Cr"_2"O"_7^(2-)(aq) + 3"SO"_2(g) -> 2"Cr"^(3+)(aq) + "H"_2"O"(l) + 3"SO"_4^(2-)(aq))#

Generally, you can leave this alone, but since you requested the counterions to be there, let's add them back.

RESTORING THE CONVENTIONS

The oxygen atoms in your reaction are not balanced. Here's how to continue from the balanced information we just received above.

Thus, it ought to be:

#color(blue)("H"_2"SO"_4(aq) + "K"_2"Cr"_2"O"_7(aq) + 3"SO"_2(g) -> "Cr"_2("SO"_4)_3(aq) + "H"_2"O"(l) + "K"_2"SO"_4(aq))#

That's right, the reaction is now balanced and includes all of the counterions!

Sign up to view the whole answer

By signing up, you agree to our Terms of Service and Privacy Policy

Sign up with email
Answer 2

#"Sulfur dioxide"#, #stackrel(+IV)"SO"_2#, is oxidized to sulfate, #stackrel(VI+)"SO"_4^(-2)#.

#SO_2(g) +2H_2O(l) rarr SO_4^(2-)+4H^(+) + 2e^(-)# #(i)#
And dichromate, #stackrel(+VI)"Cr"_2O_7^(2-)# is reduced to #Cr^(3+)#.
#Cr_2O_7^(2-) +14H^(+) + 6e^(-) rarr 2Cr^(3+)+7H_2O(l)# #(ii)#
And these are both balanced with respect to mass and charge, as they must be...........and so we takes #3xx(i) + (ii)# to eliminate the electrons.......
#3SO_2(g) +cancel(6H_2O(l)) +Cr_2O_7^(2-) +2cancel(14)H^(+) + cancel(6e^(-))rarr 3SO_4^(2-)+cancel(12H^(+)) + cancel(6e^(-))+2Cr^(3+)+cancel7H_2O(l)#

And cancel out the common reagents to give........

#Cr_2O_7^(2-)+3SO_2(g) +2H^(+)rarr 2Cr^(3+)+3SO_4^(2-)+H_2O(l)#

Which I think is balanced with respect to mass and charge, as indeed it must be if it is to reflect chemical reality.

All these redox reactions take a bit a practice. What you would observe in this reaction (and I hope that it will be demonstrated in a lab) is the orange-red colour of dichromate dissipate to give green #Cr^(3+)# ion.

See here for other examples.

Sign up to view the whole answer

By signing up, you agree to our Terms of Service and Privacy Policy

Sign up with email
Answer 3

Redox reaction in balance: [ \text{H}_2\text{SO}_4(aq) + \text{K}_2\text{Cr}_2\text{O}_7(aq) + \text{SO}_2(g) \rightarrow \text{Cr}_2\text{SO}_4(aq) + \text{H}_2\text{O}(l) + \text{K}_2\text{SO}(aq) ]

Sign up to view the whole answer

By signing up, you agree to our Terms of Service and Privacy Policy

Sign up with email
Answer from HIX Tutor

When evaluating a one-sided limit, you need to be careful when a quantity is approaching zero since its sign is different depending on which way it is approaching zero from. Let us look at some examples.

When evaluating a one-sided limit, you need to be careful when a quantity is approaching zero since its sign is different depending on which way it is approaching zero from. Let us look at some examples.

When evaluating a one-sided limit, you need to be careful when a quantity is approaching zero since its sign is different depending on which way it is approaching zero from. Let us look at some examples.

When evaluating a one-sided limit, you need to be careful when a quantity is approaching zero since its sign is different depending on which way it is approaching zero from. Let us look at some examples.

Not the question you need?

Drag image here or click to upload

Or press Ctrl + V to paste
Answer Background
HIX Tutor
Solve ANY homework problem with a smart AI
  • 98% accuracy study help
  • Covers math, physics, chemistry, biology, and more
  • Step-by-step, in-depth guides
  • Readily available 24/7