Could the League of Nations act against the aggression?

Question

Elena Arenas · Accepted Answer

In theory yes they could, practically speaking maybe not. One of the basic ideas of the League of Nations was Collective Security. The flaws in the system were shown over time.

The League could, in principle, take action against an aggressor; however, due to its constitution, decisions had to be made unanimously, meaning that a no vote amounted to a veto. Additionally, the League relied on the Great Powers to provide the armed forces necessary to carry out its decisions; if they refused to do so, regardless of their obligations under treaties, then nothing would happen. https://tutor.hix.ai

Savannah Adams · Answer

undefined Yes, the League of Nations had mechanisms in place to act against aggression. One of the main mechanisms was collective security, where member states agreed to defend each other against aggression. If a member state was attacked, other members were obligated to come to its defense, providing military and economic support. Additionally, the League had the authority to impose economic sanctions or embargoes on aggressor nations, aiming to pressure them into compliance with international law. Furthermore, the League could use diplomacy and mediation to resolve conflicts peacefully before resorting to military action. However, the effectiveness of these mechanisms depended on the willingness of member states to cooperate and enforce League decisions, which sometimes proved challenging due to competing national interests and lack of consensus.