For complex formation of iron(III) thiocyanate at a certain ionic strength, #K_f = 1099#. If its initial concentration is #"4.0 M"#, determine the equilibrium concentration of all species in solution for the dissociation of iron(III) thiocyanate in water?
You ought to obtain:
While many transition metal complexation reactions are favorable forwards, towards forming the complex, this one is actually the backwards reaction, in contrast to many equilibrium reactions.
Here is a list of some formation constants for reactions involving consecutive ligands.
This is essentially very similar to acid-base equilibrium, solubility equilibrium, and other types of equilibrium you've seen, so you can approach it just like any other equilibrium problem.
is:
In the same way, we only have an intricate dissociation equilibrium reaction:
whose complex dissociation constant in equilibrium is:
An ICE table can be set up in the same way as other equilibria.
Therefore, the equilibrium constant is useful:
There would have been a complete quadratic:
In any case, each ion's equilibrium concentrations in the solution are as follows:
By signing up, you agree to our Terms of Service and Privacy Policy
[ Fe^{3+} + 3SCN^- \rightleftharpoons Fe(SCN)_3 ]
Given: Initial concentration of Fe(SCN)₃ = 4.0 M K_f = 1099
Let x be the concentration of Fe(SCN)₃ dissociated.
At equilibrium: [ [Fe^{3+}] = 4.0 - x ] [ [SCN^-] = 4.0 - 3x ] [ [Fe(SCN)_3] = x ]
[ K_f = \frac{[Fe(SCN)_3]}{[Fe^{3+}][SCN^-]^3} ] [ 1099 = \frac{x}{(4.0 - x)(4.0 - 3x)^3} ]
Solving the equation yields: [ x = 3.34 \times 10^{-4} , M ]
At equilibrium: [ [Fe^{3+}] = 4.0 - 3.34 \times 10^{-4} , M ] [ [SCN^-] = 4.0 - 3 \times 3.34 \times 10^{-4} , M ] [ [Fe(SCN)_3] = 3.34 \times 10^{-4} , M ]
By signing up, you agree to our Terms of Service and Privacy Policy
To determine the equilibrium concentrations of all species in solution for the dissociation of iron(III) thiocyanate (( \text{Fe(SCN)}^{2+} )) in water, we can use the equilibrium constant expression and solve the equilibrium concentrations.
The dissociation reaction can be represented as:
[ \text{Fe(SCN)}^{2+} (\text{aq}) \rightleftharpoons \text{Fe}^{3+} (\text{aq}) + \text{SCN}^- (\text{aq}) ]
Given that the equilibrium constant (( K_f )) for the complex formation is ( 1099 ), the equilibrium constant expression is:
[ K_f = \frac{[\text{Fe}^{3+}][\text{SCN}^-]}{[\text{Fe(SCN)}^{2+}]} ]
Let's denote the equilibrium concentrations of ( \text{Fe(SCN)}^{2+} ), ( \text{Fe}^{3+} ), and ( \text{SCN}^- ) as ( x ), ( x ), and ( x ) respectively.
Substitute these into the equilibrium constant expression:
[ 1099 = \frac{x \cdot x}{4.0 - x} ]
Now, solve for ( x ), which represents the equilibrium concentration of ( \text{Fe(SCN)}^{2+} ).
[ x^2 = 1099 \cdot (4.0 - x) ] [ x^2 = 4396 - 1099x ] [ x^2 + 1099x - 4396 = 0 ]
Using the quadratic formula, solve for ( x ):
[ x = \frac{-b \pm \sqrt{b^2 - 4ac}}{2a} ]
Where ( a = 1 ), ( b = 1099 ), and ( c = -4396 ).
[ x = \frac{-1099 \pm \sqrt{(1099)^2 - 4(1)(-4396)}}{2(1)} ]
[ x = \frac{-1099 \pm \sqrt{1210801 + 17584}}{2} ]
[ x = \frac{-1099 \pm \sqrt{1228385}}{2} ]
[ x \approx \frac{-1099 \pm 1108.92}{2} ]
[ x \approx -554.46 \quad \text{or} \quad x \approx 553.46 ]
Since ( x ) represents a concentration, it cannot be negative. So, ( x \approx 553.46 , \text{M} ).
Therefore, the equilibrium concentrations are approximately:
[ [\text{Fe(SCN)}^{2+}] \approx 553.46 , \text{M} ] [ [\text{Fe}^{3+}] \approx 553.46 , \text{M} ] [ [\text{SCN}^-] \approx 553.46 , \text{M} ]
Please note that the concentrations are rounded to two decimal places.
By signing up, you agree to our Terms of Service and Privacy Policy
When evaluating a one-sided limit, you need to be careful when a quantity is approaching zero since its sign is different depending on which way it is approaching zero from. Let us look at some examples.
When evaluating a one-sided limit, you need to be careful when a quantity is approaching zero since its sign is different depending on which way it is approaching zero from. Let us look at some examples.
When evaluating a one-sided limit, you need to be careful when a quantity is approaching zero since its sign is different depending on which way it is approaching zero from. Let us look at some examples.
When evaluating a one-sided limit, you need to be careful when a quantity is approaching zero since its sign is different depending on which way it is approaching zero from. Let us look at some examples.
- How can one tell a reaction has reached equilibrium?
- The #pKa# of butyric acid #"HBut"# is 4.7. How do you calculate #K_b# for the butyrate ion #"But"^-#?
- Is it true that the GREATER the #"solubility product,"# #K_"sp"#, the more soluble the salt?
- What is the solubility of hydrogen (in units of grams per liter) in water at 25 °C, when the #H_2# gas over the solution has a partial pressure of .286 atm?
- Why is Calcium Hydroxide “relatively insoluble”? I mixed NaOH(aq) and CaCl2(aq) and somehow there’s precipitate, despite the fact that calcium in OH is said to be soluble.

- 98% accuracy study help
- Covers math, physics, chemistry, biology, and more
- Step-by-step, in-depth guides
- Readily available 24/7