Which of these molecules is polar? #"SiF"_4#, #"XeF"_4#, #"BF"_3#, #"SF"_4#
A polar molecule has both an uneven distribution of electrons and no total symmetry to counteract it. This image sums it up:
When a molecule has a great deal of symmetry, you can rotate it in certain ways that return it to an indistinguishable position, meaning that any polarity it has will cancel out.
(By an indistinguishable position, I mean that you can turn your back, someone else can rotate the molecule in a particular way, and when you turn around, you can't tell anything happened.)
Assuming you aren't very familiar with vectors...
For your purposes, if the molecule has any lone pairs of electrons, you can consider it not totally symmetric. Therefore, it will be polar by virtue of its shape, even if its individual bonds are not.
Using the valence electron-counting method, draw each of these Lewis structures. Each Therefore, we have four electron groups (of those four, all are bonding groups), giving a tetrahedral structure:
This is totally symmetric, so this is a nonpolar molecule, even without checking the polarity of each individual bond. (If we did, Each Therefore, we have six electron groups, two of which are lone pairs, giving a square planar structure (take two atoms off of the same axis in an octahedral molecular geometry to derive it):
This is totally symmetric, because each So, this is a nonpolar molecule, even without checking the polarity of each individual bond. I'll let you follow the previous parts of the answer to derive the molecular geometry, which is trigonal planar (recall that boron is OK with six valence electrons).
This is also totally symmetric, so this is nonpolar.
The This is not totally symmetric, so this is a polar molecule. In summary, for your purposes, if the molecule has any lone pairs of electrons, you can consider it not totally symmetric. Therefore, it will be polar by virtue of its shape, even if its individual bonds are not.
By signing up, you agree to our Terms of Service and Privacy Policy
"SF"_4 is polar.
By signing up, you agree to our Terms of Service and Privacy Policy
When evaluating a one-sided limit, you need to be careful when a quantity is approaching zero since its sign is different depending on which way it is approaching zero from. Let us look at some examples.
When evaluating a one-sided limit, you need to be careful when a quantity is approaching zero since its sign is different depending on which way it is approaching zero from. Let us look at some examples.
When evaluating a one-sided limit, you need to be careful when a quantity is approaching zero since its sign is different depending on which way it is approaching zero from. Let us look at some examples.
When evaluating a one-sided limit, you need to be careful when a quantity is approaching zero since its sign is different depending on which way it is approaching zero from. Let us look at some examples.
- What is the difference between Keesom interactions and, London dispersion forces?
- How can the polarity of a covalent bond be determined?
- Hydrogen bonding is of two types - t Intramolecular and intermolecular Am I right ?
- What is the definition of a molecule?
- How do ionic and molecular compounds compare in terms of boiling points?
- 98% accuracy study help
- Covers math, physics, chemistry, biology, and more
- Step-by-step, in-depth guides
- Readily available 24/7