How do I calculate the force constant, zero-point energy, and the energy level spacings for #""^(12) "C"""^(16)"O"# if #tildeomega_e = "2170 cm"^-1#?

Answer 1

I got, for #""^(12) "C"""^(16)"O"#:

  • #k = "1856.92 N/m"#
  • #E_0 = 1/2hnu_0 = 2.129xx10^(-20) "J"#
  • #DeltaE = hnu_0 = 4.258xx10^(-20) "J"#

We're treating the system as an anharmonic oscillator, which is basically two hard spheres connected by a spring, with a force constant #k#, a vibrational zero-point energy #E_0#, and energy level spacings #DeltaE#:

Of the above terms, zero-point energy and energy level spacings need further explanation:

  • #E_0# is the lowest possible energy of the molecule in its ground state, i.e. the energy #E_(upsilon)# as a function of the vibrational quantum number #upsilon#, at the energy level #upsilon = 0#.
  • The energy levels for this simple harmonic oscillator model go as #bb(E_(upsilon) = hnu_0(upsilon + 1/2))#, and the energy level spacings are assumed even, because there is no dampening of this ideal spring over time.

    The fundamental vibrational frequency is related to all of this, and it is the first harmonic frequency (rather than the second, third, etc. harmonics, which are the overtones) at which the molecule vibrates.

    It is the frequency #nu_0# that you need to use. However, this is not to be confused with #tildenu_0#, which is in #"cm"^(-1)#, whereas #nu_0# is in #"s"^(-1)#.

    Furthermore, you have actually given #tildenu_e#, the equilibrium frequency. NIST gives

    • #tildeomega_e -= tildenu_e = "2169.81358 cm"^(-1)#
    • #tildeomega_echi_e -= tildenu_e chi_e = "13.28831 cm"^(-1)#

    And we should recall that for an anharmonic oscillator,

    #tildenu_0 = tildenu_e - 2tildenu_echi_e#.

    First, convert over to #tildenu_0#:

    #tildenu_0 = "2170 cm"^(-1) - 2 cdot "13.28831 cm"^(-1)#

    #= "2143.4 cm"^(-1)#

    Then, you therefore need to convert from #"cm"^(-1)# to #"s"^(-1)# to get the units to work out for #E_(upsilon)#:

    #nu_0 = tildenu_0c#,

    where #c = 2.998xx10^10# #"cm/s"# is the speed of light in the proper units. If you notice, #"cm"^(-1) cdot "cm/s" = "s"^(-1)#, as required for the units of #nu_0#.

    So, we obtain the fundamental vibrational frequency in the correct units so far as:

    #color(green)(nu_0) = ("2143.4 cm"^(-1))(2.998xx10^10 "cm/s")#

    #= color(green)(6.426xx10^13 "s"^(-1))#

    So, we can now calculate the zero-point energy. #E_0# is the energy defined at #upsilon = 0#, so:

    #color(blue)(E_0) = hnu_0(0 + 1/2) = 1/2hnu_0#

    #= 1/2(6.626xx10^(-34) "J"cdot"s")(6.426xx10^13 "s"^(-1))#

    #= color(blue)(2.129xx10^(-20) "J")#

    compared to an experimental value of #2.149 xx 10^(-20) "J"# (the reference shows it in #"cm"^(-1)# on pg. 7).

    Then, the energy level spacings can be calculated without much effort if we use the definition of #DeltaE#:

    #color(blue)(DeltaE) = E_1 - E_0 = [ . . . ] = E_(upsilon+1) - E_(upsilon)#

    #= hnu_0(upsilon + 1 + 1/2) - hnu_0(upsilon + 1/2)#

    #= hnu_0(upsilon + 3/2) - hnu_0(upsilon + 1/2)#

    #= hnu_0[(upsilon + 3/2) - (upsilon + 1/2)]#

    #= hnu_0(cancel(upsilon) + 3/2 - cancel(upsilon) - 1/2)#

    #= hnu_0#

    #= (6.626xx10^(-34) "J"cdot"s")(6.426xx10^13 "s"^(-1))#

    #= color(blue)(4.258xx10^(-20) "J")#

    And now the last thing we need is the force constant #k#! Recall that the angular frequency from physics is defined as:

    #omega = sqrt(k/m)#,

    where #omega# is the angular frequency and #m# is the mass.

    For this system however, we instead utilize the reduced mass, #mu = (m_1m_2)/(m_1 + m_2)#, and treat the system as one "effective mass". Also, recall that #omega/(2pi) = nu_0 = 1/T#, where #T# is the period in #"s"#.

    Combine that with the equation #nu_0 = stackrel(~)nu_0c# to find that:

    #bb(stackrel(~)nu_0 = 1/(2pic)sqrt(k/mu))#,

    or

    #bb(nu_0 = 1/(2pi)sqrt(k/mu))#.

    First, we should find the reduced mass using the ISOTOPIC molar masses of each element:

    #""_(8)^(16) "O":# #"15.994915 g/mol"#
    #""_(6)^(12) "C":# #"12 g/mol"#

    Note that in order for the units to work out, these must be in #bb("kg/mol")#!

    #mu = (m_(C)m_(O))/(m_C + m_O)#

    #= (("0.012000 kg/mol")("0.015994915 g/mol"))/("0.012000 + 0.015994915 kg/mol")#

    #=# #"0.006856 kg/mol"#

    Since we already have the value of #nu_0#, we can now find the force/spring constant:

    #2pinu_0 = sqrt(k/mu)#

    #=> color(blue)(k) = mu(2pinu_0)^2#

    #= "0.006856 kg"/cancel"mol"xx(cancel"1 mol")/(6.0221413xx10^(23) "things")[(2pi)(6.426xx10^13 "s"^(-1))]^2#

    #=# #color(blue)("1856.92 kg/s"^2 = "1856.92 N/m")#

    whereas the experimental force constant in this reference is #"1901.82 N/m"# (derived from #tildeomega_e = 2169.76689(8)# #"cm"^(-1)#, which is just another notation for #tildenu_e#), while in this reference it is #"1860 N/m"# for #tildenu_0 ~~ "2141.42 cm"^(-1)#.

Sign up to view the whole answer

By signing up, you agree to our Terms of Service and Privacy Policy

Sign up with email
Answer 2

To calculate the force constant ( k ) for a diatomic molecule using the harmonic oscillator approximation, you can use the equation:

[ k = \tilde{\omega}_e^2 \times \mu ]

where ( \tilde{\omega}_e ) is the vibrational wavenumber, and ( \mu ) is the reduced mass of the molecule.

To calculate the zero-point energy ( E_0 ), you can use the equation:

[ E_0 = \frac{1}{2} \tilde{\omega}_e ]

And finally, to calculate the energy level spacings ( \Delta E ) between adjacent vibrational levels, you can use the equation:

[ \Delta E = \tilde{\omega}_e ]

Given ( \tilde{\omega}_e = 2170 , \text{cm}^{-1} ), you can use this information to calculate the force constant, zero-point energy, and energy level spacings.

Sign up to view the whole answer

By signing up, you agree to our Terms of Service and Privacy Policy

Sign up with email
Answer from HIX Tutor

When evaluating a one-sided limit, you need to be careful when a quantity is approaching zero since its sign is different depending on which way it is approaching zero from. Let us look at some examples.

When evaluating a one-sided limit, you need to be careful when a quantity is approaching zero since its sign is different depending on which way it is approaching zero from. Let us look at some examples.

When evaluating a one-sided limit, you need to be careful when a quantity is approaching zero since its sign is different depending on which way it is approaching zero from. Let us look at some examples.

When evaluating a one-sided limit, you need to be careful when a quantity is approaching zero since its sign is different depending on which way it is approaching zero from. Let us look at some examples.

Not the question you need?

Drag image here or click to upload

Or press Ctrl + V to paste
Answer Background
HIX Tutor
Solve ANY homework problem with a smart AI
  • 98% accuracy study help
  • Covers math, physics, chemistry, biology, and more
  • Step-by-step, in-depth guides
  • Readily available 24/7