Which statement is INCONSISTENT with Dalton's atomic theory?

#"i. Atoms are hard, indivisible spheres;"#
#"ii. Atoms are composed of smaller particles;"#
#"iii. Atoms combine in definite ratios;"#
#"iv. Atoms possess definite masses."#

Answer 1

Clearly, #ii.# is inconsistent (or does not follow from) with Dalton's atomic theory.

#ii.# describes a nuclear property, not a chemical property. Of course, Dalton could not interrogate nuclear processes, and his ideas about atoms and molecules were inferences from known chemistry.
Sign up to view the whole answer

By signing up, you agree to our Terms of Service and Privacy Policy

Sign up with email
Answer 2

Protons, neutrons, and electrons are the subatomic particles that make up an atom.

Sign up to view the whole answer

By signing up, you agree to our Terms of Service and Privacy Policy

Sign up with email
Answer from HIX Tutor

When evaluating a one-sided limit, you need to be careful when a quantity is approaching zero since its sign is different depending on which way it is approaching zero from. Let us look at some examples.

When evaluating a one-sided limit, you need to be careful when a quantity is approaching zero since its sign is different depending on which way it is approaching zero from. Let us look at some examples.

When evaluating a one-sided limit, you need to be careful when a quantity is approaching zero since its sign is different depending on which way it is approaching zero from. Let us look at some examples.

When evaluating a one-sided limit, you need to be careful when a quantity is approaching zero since its sign is different depending on which way it is approaching zero from. Let us look at some examples.

Not the question you need?

Drag image here or click to upload

Or press Ctrl + V to paste
Answer Background
HIX Tutor
Solve ANY homework problem with a smart AI
  • 98% accuracy study help
  • Covers math, physics, chemistry, biology, and more
  • Step-by-step, in-depth guides
  • Readily available 24/7